Lopez Laureen M, Grimes David A, Schulz Kenneth F, Curtis Kathryn M, Chen Mario
Clinical Sciences, FHI 360, 359 Blackwell St, Suite 200, Durham, North Carolina, USA, 27701.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 24;2014(6):CD006033. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006033.pub5.
Steroidal contraceptive use has been associated with changes in bone mineral density in women. Whether such changes increase the risk of fractures later in life is not clear. Osteoporosis is a major public health concern. Age-related decline in bone mass increases the risk of fracture, especially of the spine, hip, and wrist. Concern about bone health influences the recommendation and use of these effective contraceptives globally.
Our aim was to evaluate the effect of using hormonal contraceptives before menopause on the risk of fracture in women.
Through April 2014, we searched for studies of fracture or bone health and hormonal contraceptives in MEDLINE, POPLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, and LILACS, as well as ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP. We examined reference lists of relevant articles for other trials. For the initial review, we wrote to investigators to find additional trials.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were considered if they examined fractures, bone mineral density (BMD), or bone turnover markers in women with hormonal contraceptive use prior to menopause. Eligible interventions included comparisons of a hormonal contraceptive with a placebo or with another hormonal contraceptive that differed in terms of drug, dosage, or regimen. They also included providing a supplement to one group.
We assessed all titles and abstracts identified through the literature searches. Mean differences were computed using the inverse variance approach. For dichotomous outcomes, the Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio (OR) was calculated. Both included the 95% confidence interval (CI) and used a fixed-effect model. Due to differing interventions, no trials could be combined for meta-analysis. We applied principles from GRADE to assess the evidence quality and address confidence in the effect estimates. In addition, a sensitivity analysis included trials that provided sufficient data for this review and evidence of at least moderate quality.
We found 19 RCTs that met our eligibility criteria. Eleven trials compared different combined oral contraceptives (COCs) or regimens of COCs; five examined an injectable versus another injectable, implant, or IUD; two studied implants, and one compared the transdermal patch versus the vaginal ring. No trial had fracture as an outcome. BMD was measured in 17 studies and 12 trials assessed biochemical markers of bone turnover. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) was associated with decreased bone mineral density (BMD). The placebo-controlled trials showed BMD increases for DMPA plus estrogen supplement and decreases for DMPA plus placebo supplement. COCs did not appear to negatively affect BMD, and some formulations had more positive effects than others. However, no COC trial was placebo-controlled. Where studies showed differences between groups in bone turnover markers, the results were generally consistent with those for BMD. For implants, the single-rod etonogestrel group showed a greater BMD decrease versus the two-rod levonorgestrel group but results were not consistent across all implant comparisons.The sensitivity analysis included 11 trials providing evidence of moderate or high quality. Four trials involving DMPA showed some positive effects of an estrogen supplement on BMD, a negative effect of DMPA-subcutaneous on lumbar spine BMD, and a negative effect of DMPA on a bone formation marker. Of the three COC trials, one had a BMD decrease for the group with gestodene plus EE 15 μg. Another indicated less bone resorption in the group with gestodene plus EE 30 μg versus EE 20 μg.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Whether steroidal contraceptives influence fracture risk cannot be determined from existing information. The evidence quality was considered moderate overall, largely due to the trials of DMPA, implants, and the patch versus ring. The COC evidence varied in quality but was low overall. Many trials had small numbers of participants and some had large losses. Health care providers and women should consider the costs and benefits of these effective contraceptives. For example, injectable contraceptives and implants provide effective, long-term birth control yet do not involve a daily regimen. Progestin-only contraceptives are considered appropriate for women who should avoid estrogen due to medical conditions.
使用甾体类避孕药与女性骨矿物质密度的变化有关。这种变化是否会增加日后生活中骨折的风险尚不清楚。骨质疏松是一个主要的公共卫生问题。与年龄相关的骨量下降会增加骨折风险,尤其是脊柱、髋部和腕部骨折。对骨骼健康的担忧影响了这些有效避孕药在全球的推荐和使用。
我们的目的是评估绝经前使用激素避孕药对女性骨折风险的影响。
截至2014年4月,我们在医学文献数据库(MEDLINE)、计划生育文献数据库(POPLINE)、考克兰系统评价数据库(CENTRAL)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)、拉丁美洲及加勒比地区卫生科学数据库(LILACS)以及临床试验数据库(ClinicalTrials.gov)和国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP)中检索了有关骨折或骨骼健康与激素避孕药的研究。我们查阅了相关文章的参考文献列表以寻找其他试验。对于初步综述,我们写信给研究人员以寻找更多试验。
如果随机对照试验(RCT)研究了绝经前使用激素避孕药的女性的骨折、骨矿物质密度(BMD)或骨转换标志物,则予以考虑。符合条件的干预措施包括将一种激素避孕药与安慰剂或另一种在药物、剂量或给药方案方面不同的激素避孕药进行比较。还包括为一组提供补充剂。
我们评估了通过文献检索确定的所有标题和摘要。使用逆方差法计算平均差异。对于二分结局,计算Mantel-Haenszel比值比(OR)。两者均包括95%置信区间(CI)并使用固定效应模型。由于干预措施不同,无法将试验合并进行荟萃分析。我们应用GRADE的原则来评估证据质量并处理对效应估计的置信度。此外,敏感性分析纳入了为本综述提供足够数据且证据质量至少为中等的试验。
我们发现19项随机对照试验符合我们的入选标准。11项试验比较了不同的复方口服避孕药(COC)或COC给药方案;5项试验研究了一种注射剂与另一种注射剂、植入剂或宫内节育器(IUD)的比较;2项试验研究了植入剂,1项试验比较了透皮贴剂与阴道环。没有试验将骨折作为结局。17项研究测量了骨矿物质密度,12项试验评估了骨转换的生化标志物。醋酸甲羟孕酮长效注射剂(DMPA)与骨矿物质密度降低有关。安慰剂对照试验显示,DMPA加雌激素补充剂组骨矿物质密度增加,DMPA加安慰剂补充剂组骨矿物质密度降低。复方口服避孕药似乎对骨矿物质密度没有负面影响,有些配方比其他配方有更积极的影响。然而,没有复方口服避孕药试验是安慰剂对照的。在研究显示组间骨转换标志物存在差异的情况下,结果通常与骨矿物质密度的结果一致。对于植入剂,单棒依托孕烯组的骨矿物质密度下降幅度大于双棒左炔诺孕酮组,但并非所有植入剂比较的结果都一致。敏感性分析纳入了11项提供中等或高质量证据的试验。4项涉及DMPA的试验显示,雌激素补充剂对骨矿物质密度有一些积极影响,皮下注射DMPA对腰椎骨矿物质密度有负面影响,DMPA对骨形成标志物有负面影响。在3项复方口服避孕药试验中,一项试验显示孕二烯酮加15μg炔雌醇组骨矿物质密度下降。另一项试验表明,孕二烯酮加30μg炔雌醇组与20μg炔雌醇组相比,骨吸收较少。
现有信息无法确定甾体类避孕药是否会影响骨折风险。总体而言,证据质量被认为是中等的,主要是由于DMPA、植入剂以及贴剂与阴道环的试验。复方口服避孕药的证据质量参差不齐,但总体较低。许多试验的参与者数量较少,有些试验有大量失访。医疗保健提供者和女性应考虑这些有效避孕药的成本和益处。例如,注射用避孕药和植入剂提供有效且长期的避孕效果,但不需要每日服药。仅含孕激素的避孕药被认为适合因医疗状况应避免雌激素的女性。