Suppr超能文献

白内障手术中不良医疗事件及其与麻醉管理策略的关联

Adverse intraoperative medical events and their association with anesthesia management strategies in cataract surgery.

作者信息

Katz J, Feldman M A, Bass E B, Lubomski L H, Tielsch J M, Petty B G, Fleisher L A, Schein O D

机构信息

Department of International Health, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205-2103, USA.

出版信息

Ophthalmology. 2001 Oct;108(10):1721-6. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00704-7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare adverse medical events by different anesthesia strategies for cataract surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients 50 years of age and older undergoing 19,250 cataract surgeries at nine centers in the United States and Canada between June 1995 and June 1997.

INTERVENTION

Local anesthesia applied topically or by injection, with or without oral and intravenous sedatives, opioid analgesia, hypnotics, and diphenhydramine (Benadryl).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Intraoperative and postoperative adverse medical events.

RESULTS

Twenty-six percent of surgeries were performed with topical anesthesia and the remainder with injection anesthesia. There was no increase in deaths and hospitalizations associated with any specific anesthesia strategy. No statistically significant difference was observed in the prevalence of intraoperative events between topical and injection anesthesia without intravenous sedatives (0.13% and 0.78%, respectively). The use of intravenous sedatives was associated with a significant increase in adverse events for topical (1.20%) and injection anesthesia (1.18%), relative to topical anesthesia without intravenous sedation. The use of short-acting hypnotic agents with injection anesthesia was also associated with a significant increase in adverse events when used alone (1.40%) or in combination with opiates (1.75%), sedatives (2.65%), and with the combination of opiates and sedatives (4.04%). These differences remained after adjusting for age, gender, duration of surgery, and American Society of Anesthesiologists risk class.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant intravenous anesthetic agents used to decrease pain and alleviate anxiety are associated with increases in medical events. However, cataract surgery is a safe procedure with a low absolute risk of medical complications with either topical or injection anesthesia. Clinicians should weigh the risks and benefits of their use for individual patients.

摘要

目的

比较白内障手术不同麻醉策略下的不良医疗事件。

设计

前瞻性队列研究。

参与者

1995年6月至1997年6月期间在美国和加拿大九个中心接受19250例白内障手术的50岁及以上患者。

干预措施

局部麻醉采用局部涂抹或注射,使用或不使用口服和静脉镇静剂、阿片类镇痛药、催眠药和苯海拉明(苯那君)。

主要观察指标

术中和术后不良医疗事件。

结果

26%的手术采用局部麻醉,其余采用注射麻醉。未发现与任何特定麻醉策略相关的死亡和住院人数增加。在不使用静脉镇静剂的局部麻醉和注射麻醉之间,术中事件的发生率未观察到统计学上的显著差异(分别为0.13%和0.78%)。与不使用静脉镇静的局部麻醉相比,使用静脉镇静剂会使局部麻醉(1.20%)和注射麻醉(1.18%)的不良事件显著增加。注射麻醉单独使用短效催眠药(1.40%)或与阿片类药物(1.75%)、镇静剂(2.65%)以及阿片类药物和镇静剂联合使用(4.04%)时,也会使不良事件显著增加。在调整年龄、性别、手术持续时间和美国麻醉医师协会风险分级后,这些差异仍然存在。

结论

用于减轻疼痛和缓解焦虑的辅助静脉麻醉药物与医疗事件增加有关。然而,白内障手术是一种安全的手术,局部麻醉或注射麻醉的医疗并发症绝对风险较低。临床医生应权衡其对个体患者使用的风险和益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验