Katz J, Feldman M A, Bass E B, Lubomski L H, Tielsch J M, Petty B G, Fleisher L A, Schein O D
Department of International Health, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205-2103, USA.
Ophthalmology. 2000 Nov;107(11):2054-60. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00359-6.
To compare patient reports of intraoperative pain and postoperative side effects by different anesthesia strategies for cataract surgery.
Prospective cohort study.
Men and women 50 years of age and older undergoing 19,250 cataract surgeries at nine centers in the United States and Canada from June 1995 through June 1997.
Topical anesthesia or anesthesia with injection, with or without sedatives, opioid analgesia, hypnotics, and diphenhydramine (Benadryl).
Patient ratings of intraoperative pain, satisfaction with pain management, and early postoperative side effects (drowsiness, nausea, vomiting, or a combination thereof).
Twenty-six percent of surgeries were performed using topical anesthesia alone, and the remainder were performed with peribulbar, retrobulbar, or facial nerve block, or a combination thereof. Local anesthesia by injection with sedatives and diphenhydramine resulted in the lowest reporting of any intraoperative pain (1.3%), with postoperative drowsiness (9.6%) and nausea, vomiting, or both (1.5%) comparable with those administered topical anesthesia alone. Among those receiving topical anesthesia, use of sedatives and opioids reduced reports of any pain during surgery by 56% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34%, 70%), but increased nausea and vomiting (odds ratio, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.26, 4.09) compared with those administered topical anesthesia alone, after adjusting for age, gender, race, American Society of Anesthesiologists risk class, self-reported health status, and duration of surgery. Among those receiving local injections, use of opioids reduced reports of any pain among those receiving sedatives by 37% (95% CI, 15%, 54%), but did not increase postoperative side effects. The use of diphenhydramine among those receiving sedatives decreased reports of any pain by 59% (95% CI, 33%, 75%) and also reduced drowsiness and nausea and vomiting by 57% (95% CI, 48%, 65%) and by 60% (95% CI, 36%, 75%), respectively. Use of hypnotics with sedatives was associated with increased reports of any pain during surgery and increased nausea and vomiting after surgery.
Patient reports of any pain during cataract surgery (5%) and postoperative side effects (16% drowsiness and 4% nausea and vomiting) were low, but varied by anesthesia strategy. Patient perceptions of pain and side effects can be helpful in guiding the appropriate choice of anesthesia strategy.
比较白内障手术不同麻醉策略下患者术中疼痛及术后副作用的报告情况。
前瞻性队列研究。
1995年6月至1997年6月期间,在美国和加拿大9个中心接受19250例白内障手术的50岁及以上男性和女性。
表面麻醉或注射麻醉,可联合或不联合使用镇静剂、阿片类镇痛药、催眠药和苯海拉明(苯那君)。
患者对术中疼痛的评分、对疼痛管理的满意度以及术后早期副作用(嗜睡、恶心、呕吐或其组合)。
26%的手术仅采用表面麻醉,其余手术采用球周、球后或面神经阻滞,或联合使用这些方法。注射镇静剂和苯海拉明的局部麻醉导致术中任何疼痛的报告率最低(1.3%),术后嗜睡(9.6%)以及恶心、呕吐或两者兼有的发生率(1.5%)与仅采用表面麻醉相当。在接受表面麻醉的患者中,与仅接受表面麻醉的患者相比,使用镇静剂和阿片类药物使手术期间任何疼痛的报告率降低了56%(95%置信区间[CI],34%,70%),但恶心和呕吐发生率增加(优势比,2.27;95%CI,1.26,4.09),调整年龄、性别、种族、美国麻醉医师协会风险分级、自我报告的健康状况和手术时长后亦是如此。在接受局部注射的患者中,使用阿片类药物使接受镇静剂患者中任何疼痛的报告率降低了37%(95%CI,15%,54%),但未增加术后副作用。在接受镇静剂的患者中使用苯海拉明使任何疼痛的报告率降低了59%(95%CI,33%,75%),并分别使嗜睡以及恶心和呕吐发生率降低了57%(95%CI,48%,65%)和60%(95%CI,36%,75%)。使用催眠药联合镇静剂与手术期间任何疼痛的报告率增加以及术后恶心和呕吐发生率增加相关。
白内障手术期间患者任何疼痛的报告率(5%)以及术后副作用(嗜睡16%、恶心和呕吐4%)较低,但因麻醉策略而异。患者对疼痛和副作用的感知有助于指导麻醉策略的合理选择。