Robinson A, Thompson D G, Wilkin D, Roberts C
Section of Gastrointestinal Science, University of Manchester, Clinical Sciences Building, Hope Hospital, M6 8HD, Salford, UK.
Lancet. 2001 Sep 22;358(9286):976-81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06105-0.
Ulcerative colitis is managed mainly in secondary care by regular outpatient reviews done by specialist clinicians. Alternatives would be to discharge patients to primary care or to provide open-access clinics, but neither of these options reduce patients' dependency on doctors or allow patients' involvement in disease management. We did a randomised controlled trial to assess an alternative to traditional outpatient care.
We randomly assigned 203 patients with ulcerative colitis who were undergoing hospital follow-up to receive patient-centred self-management training and follow-up on request (intervention group), or normal treatment and follow-up (control group). The main outcome was the interval between relapse and treatment, and secondary outcomes were rates of primary and secondary care consultation, quality of life, and acceptability to patients. Analysis was by intention to treat.
Intervention patients had relapses treated within a mean of 14.8 h (SD 19.1) compared with 49.6 h (65.1) in controls (difference 34.8 h [95% CI 16.4-60.2]). Furthermore, intervention patients compared with controls made significantly fewer visits to hospital (0.9 vs 2.9 per patient per year, difference 2.0 [1.6-2.7]) and to the primary-care physician (0.3 vs 0.9 per patient per year, difference 0.6 [0.2-1.1], p<0.006). Only two patients in the intervention group preferred traditional management. Health-related quality-of-life scores were unchanged in both groups.
Self-management of ulcerative colitis accelerates treatment provision and reduces doctor visits, and does not increase morbidity. This approach could be used in long-term management of many other chronic diseases to improve health-service provision and use, and to reduce costs.
溃疡性结肠炎主要在二级医疗保健机构由专科临床医生定期进行门诊复查来管理。其他选择是将患者转回初级医疗保健机构或提供开放式门诊,但这两种选择都无法减少患者对医生的依赖,也不能让患者参与疾病管理。我们进行了一项随机对照试验,以评估传统门诊护理的替代方案。
我们将203例正在接受医院随访的溃疡性结肠炎患者随机分配,一组接受以患者为中心的自我管理培训并根据需求进行随访(干预组),另一组接受常规治疗和随访(对照组)。主要结局是复发与治疗之间的间隔时间,次要结局是初级和二级医疗保健咨询率、生活质量以及患者的可接受性。分析采用意向性分析。
干预组患者复发后平均在14.8小时(标准差19.1)内接受治疗,而对照组为49.6小时(65.1)(差异34.8小时[95%置信区间16.4 - 60.2])。此外,与对照组相比,干预组患者到医院就诊的次数显著减少(每位患者每年0.9次对2.9次,差异2.0[1.6 - 2.7]),到初级保健医生处就诊的次数也显著减少(每位患者每年0.3次对0.9次,差异0.6[0.2 - 1.1],p<0.006)。干预组中只有两名患者更喜欢传统管理方式。两组与健康相关的生活质量评分均未改变。
溃疡性结肠炎的自我管理加快了治疗提供速度,减少了看医生的次数,且不会增加发病率。这种方法可用于许多其他慢性病的长期管理,以改善医疗服务的提供和利用,并降低成本。