Pääkkönen A K, Morgan M J
Department of Clinical Neuropysiology, Kuopio University and Kuopio University Hospital, PO Box 1777, FIN-70211, Kuopio, Finland.
Vision Res. 2001 Sep;41(21):2771-7. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00170-5.
Human observers are not normally conscious of blur from moving objects [Nature 284 (1980) 164]. Several recent reports have even shown that blurred images appear sharper when drifting than when stationary and have suggested different non-linear mechanisms to explain this phenomenon [Vision Res. 36 (1996) 2729; Vision Res. 38 (1998) 2099]. We demonstrate here that even though distortions of drifting narrow-band sine-wave gratings cannot be explained by linear mechanisms, these mechanisms may have an important role in sharpening of moving edges. We show first that the effective spatial filter for a moving object that is formed by a simple difference-of-Gaussians spatial filter and the typical biphasic temporal impulse response function can be approximated by a combination of Gaussian filters only. When this filter is applied to moving, Gaussian-blurred edges, regions of blurring and sharpening are found over the same ranges of blur widths and velocities where recent experimental findings have shown them to exist. In general, that means that the output of the filter shows blurring in response to small blur widths and sharpening in response to larger blur widths.
人类观察者通常不会意识到移动物体产生的模糊[《自然》284 (1980) 164]。最近的几份报告甚至表明,模糊图像在漂移时比静止时看起来更清晰,并提出了不同的非线性机制来解释这一现象[《视觉研究》36 (1996) 2729;《视觉研究》38 (1998) 2099]。我们在此证明,尽管漂移的窄带正弦波光栅的失真不能用线性机制来解释,但这些机制可能在移动边缘的锐化中起重要作用。我们首先表明,由简单的高斯差分空间滤波器和典型的双相时间脉冲响应函数形成的移动物体的有效空间滤波器可以仅由高斯滤波器的组合来近似。当将此滤波器应用于移动的高斯模糊边缘时,在最近的实验结果表明它们存在的相同模糊宽度和速度范围内,发现了模糊和锐化区域。一般来说,这意味着滤波器的输出在响应小模糊宽度时显示模糊,而在响应大模糊宽度时显示锐化。