Farr B M
Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0473, USA.
Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Nov 15;33(10):1733-8. doi: 10.1086/323402. Epub 2001 Oct 5.
Prevention of vascular catheter-related infection remains an important priority. This review focuses on salient controversies regarding optimal preventive methods. Intensity of surveillance for nosocomial infections was the single most important predictor of prevention in the Study of the Efficacy of Nosocomial Infection Control (SENIC). Used suboptimally by most hospitals in the SENIC study, surveillance is probably conducted even less today. There has been one randomized trial of the optimal method of aseptic insertion for central venous catheters and none comparing the 2 most frequently used sites. Scheduled replacement did not prevent infection in multiple randomized trials but, according to a recent survey, was still being used frequently. Chlorhexidine preparation of skin before and during catheterization has significantly reduced colonization of catheters in multiple randomized trials and should be used. Impregnation of catheter and/or hub surfaces with antiseptics raises less concern about fostering the development of antibiotic resistance than does the use of antibiotics for this purpose.
预防血管导管相关感染仍然是一项重要的优先事项。本综述聚焦于有关最佳预防方法的突出争议。在医院感染控制效果研究(SENIC)中,医院感染监测强度是预防的唯一最重要预测因素。在SENIC研究中,大多数医院对监测的利用并不理想,如今监测的实施可能更少。关于中心静脉导管无菌插入的最佳方法仅有一项随机试验,且没有比较两个最常用部位的研究。在多项随机试验中,定期更换并未预防感染,但根据最近的一项调查,仍在频繁使用。在多项随机试验中,插管前和插管期间用氯己定进行皮肤准备已显著减少导管定植,应予以使用。与为此目的使用抗生素相比,用防腐剂浸渍导管和/或接头表面引发对抗生素耐药性发展的担忧较少。