Jhala D N, Atkinson B F, Balsara G R, Hernandez E, Jhala N C
Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1922 6th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35223, USA.
Ann Diagn Pathol. 2001 Oct;5(5):267-73. doi: 10.1053/adpa.2001.27913.
Endometrial adenocarcinoma is the leading cause of malignancy of the female genital tract. Prognosis of this tumor, which has implications on patient management, is determined by evaluation of the stage of disease, architectural grade, nuclear grade, myometrial invasion, and peritoneal cytology. These parameters have inherent subjectivity and, therefore, the search for an objective reliable parameter to determine prognosis is required. DNA ploidy is under investigation as an objective and reproducible prognostic parameter. This study will evaluate the role of DNA ploidy and its relationship to the traditional parameters as predictors of prognosis in patients with endometrial carcinoma. Fifty-eight patients were evaluated by two observers for architectural grade according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics classification, nuclear grade, and depth of myometrial invasion. DNA ploidy was evaluated using flow cytometer (FACscan, Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA). Histologic parameters were than compared with DNA ploidy. Survival data were obtained from the tumor registry. Results of patient survival were compared with histologic parameters and DNA ploidy. Higher nuclear grade and aneuploidy correlated with poor survival rate (P <.05). Higher nuclear grade correlated with aneuploidy. The survival of patients with architectural grade 2 (moderately differentiated) endometrial adenocarcinoma is poorer if the tumor is aneuploid as compared with diploid as determined by flow cytometry. In conclusion, aneuploidy and nuclear grade correlates with poor patient survival. The poorer survival rates with aneuploid architectural grade 2 endometrial adenocarcinoma may have an impact on clinical management.
子宫内膜腺癌是女性生殖道恶性肿瘤的主要病因。该肿瘤的预后对患者治疗有重要意义,其取决于疾病分期、组织学分级、核分级、肌层浸润及腹腔细胞学检查的评估。这些参数具有内在主观性,因此需要寻找一种客观可靠的参数来确定预后。DNA倍体作为一种客观且可重复的预后参数正在研究中。本研究将评估DNA倍体的作用及其与传统参数的关系,作为子宫内膜癌患者预后的预测指标。由两名观察者根据国际妇产科联合会的分类标准对58例患者的组织学分级、核分级及肌层浸润深度进行评估。使用流式细胞仪(FACscan,Becton Dickinson,圣何塞,加利福尼亚州)评估DNA倍体。然后将组织学参数与DNA倍体进行比较。生存数据来自肿瘤登记处。将患者生存结果与组织学参数和DNA倍体进行比较。较高的核分级和非整倍体与较差的生存率相关(P<.05)。较高的核分级与非整倍体相关。流式细胞术检测显示,与二倍体建筑分级为2级(中分化)的子宫内膜腺癌患者相比,非整倍体肿瘤患者的生存率更低。总之,非整倍体和核分级与患者较差的生存率相关。非整倍体建筑分级为2级的子宫内膜腺癌患者较差的生存率可能会对临床治疗产生影响。