Suppr超能文献

用盖勃法测定生乳和加工乳中的脂肪:协作研究

Determination of fat in raw and processed milks by the Gerber method: collaborative study.

作者信息

Kleyn D H, Lynch J M, Barbano D M, Bloom M J, Mitchell M W

机构信息

Rutgers University, Cook College, New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station, Department of Food Science, New Brunswick 08903, USA.

出版信息

J AOAC Int. 2001 Sep-Oct;84(5):1499-508.

Abstract

The Gerber method is used worldwide as a simple and rapid method for determining fat in raw and processed milks. However, the volume of the test portion used in the method has not been internationally agreed upon. A collaborative study was conducted to evaluate performance of the Gerber method using either a weighed test portion (11.13 g) or by a 10.77 mL test portion delivered by pipet. For each method, laboratories received 10 test samples: 5 raw and 5 pasteurized homogenized milks, 2 of which were blind duplicate pairs. Eleven and 10 laboratories participated in the evaluation of aliquot addition by weight and pipet, respectively. Mojonnier ether extraction (Method 989.05) was used as the reference method. Interlaboratory study statistics were similar between methods of test portion addition and between raw and processed materials; therefore, summary interlaboratory study statistics were pooled. The fat content of milk samples ranged from 0.96 to 5.48%. Absolute reproducibility and repeatability were not affected by fat level, and pooled statistical performance (invalid and outlier data removed) was (g fat/100 g milk) s(r) = 0.026, s(R) = 0.047, r = 0.074, and R = 0.132. Relative standard deviations increased with decreasing fat content, and were summarized by fat level: 1-2% fat milk, mean = 1.437, RSD(r) = 1.809%, RSD(R) = 3.271%; 2-6% fat milk, mean = 4.156, RSD(r) = 0.626%, RSD(R) = 1.131%. Compared with ether extraction, test results by the Gerber method were slightly lower (0.02% fat) using a weighed test portion and significantly lower (0.06% fat) using a 10.77 mL volume addition by pipet. A trend toward underestimating fat content at lower fat concentrations (1-2% fat) was observed with the weighed test portion but not when a pipet was used. The Associate Referee recommends that the Gerber method using a weighed test portion be adopted as First Action with applicability limited to whole milk.

摘要

格伯法作为一种测定生乳和加工乳脂肪的简单快速方法在全球范围内被广泛使用。然而,该方法中所用试样的体积尚未在国际上达成一致。开展了一项协同研究,以评估使用称重试样(11.13克)或通过移液管加入10.77毫升试样的格伯法的性能。对于每种方法,各实验室收到10个测试样品:5份生乳和5份巴氏杀菌均质乳,其中2份为盲法重复样对。分别有11个和10个实验室参与了称重法和移液管法加入等分试样的评估。莫乔尼尔醚萃取法(方法989.05)用作参考方法。两种试样加入方法之间以及生乳和加工乳之间的实验室间研究统计数据相似;因此,汇总了实验室间研究统计数据。牛奶样品的脂肪含量范围为0.96%至5.48%。绝对再现性和重复性不受脂肪水平影响,汇总后的统计性能(去除无效和异常数据)为(克脂肪/100克牛奶)s(r)=0.026,s(R)=0.047,r=0.074,R=0.132。相对标准偏差随脂肪含量降低而增加,并按脂肪水平汇总如下:脂肪含量为1 - 2%的牛奶,平均值 = 1.437,RSD(r)=1.809%,RSD(R)=3.271%;脂肪含量为2 - 6%的牛奶,平均值 = 4.156,RSD(r)=0.626%,RSD(R)=1.131%。与醚萃取法相比,使用称重试样时格伯法的测试结果略低(脂肪含量低0.02%),而使用移液管加入10.77毫升试样时则显著低(脂肪含量低0.06%)。对于称重试样,在较低脂肪浓度(1 - 2%脂肪)下观察到有低估脂肪含量的趋势,但使用移液管时未观察到此趋势。副裁判建议采用使用称重试样的格伯法作为首次行动方法,其适用范围限于全脂牛奶。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验