Huang C Y, Mow V C, Ateshian G A
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
J Biomech Eng. 2001 Oct;123(5):410-7. doi: 10.1115/1.1392316.
A long-standing challenge in the biomechanics of connective tissues (e.g., articular cartilage, ligament, tendon) has been the reported disparities between their tensile and compressive properties. In general, the intrinsic tensile properties of the solid matrices of these tissues are dictated by the collagen content and microstructural architecture, and the intrinsic compressive properties are dictated by their proteoglycan content and molecular organization as well as water content. These distinct materials give rise to a pronounced and experimentally well-documented nonlinear tension-compression stress-strain responses, as well as biphasic or intrinsic extracellular matrix viscoelastic responses. While many constitutive models of articular cartilage have captured one or more of these experimental responses, no single constitutive law has successfully described the uniaxial tensile and compressive responses of cartilage within the same framework. The objective of this study was to combine two previously proposed extensions of the biphasic theory of Mow et al. [1980, ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 102, pp. 73-84] to incorporate tension-compression nonlinearity as well as intrinsic viscoelasticity of the solid matrix of cartilage. The biphasic-conewise linear elastic model proposed by Soltz and Ateshian [2000, ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 122, pp. 576-586] and based on the bimodular stress-strain constitutive law introduced by Curnier et al. [1995, J. Elasticity, 37, pp. 1-38], as well as the biphasic poroviscoelastic model of Mak [1986, ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 108, pp. 123-130], which employs the quasi-linear viscoelastic model of Fung [1981, Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues, Springer-Verlag, New York], were combined in a single model to analyze the response of cartilage to standard testing configurations. Results were compared to experimental data from the literature and it was found that a simultaneous prediction of compression and tension experiments of articular cartilage, under stress-relaxation and dynamic loading, can be achieved when properly taking into account both flow-dependent and flow-independent viscoelasticity effects, as well as tension-compression nonlinearity.
结缔组织(如关节软骨、韧带、肌腱)生物力学中一个长期存在的挑战是,其拉伸和压缩特性之间存在已报道的差异。一般来说,这些组织固体基质的固有拉伸特性由胶原蛋白含量和微观结构决定,固有压缩特性则由蛋白聚糖含量、分子组织以及含水量决定。这些不同的材料会导致明显的、实验上有充分记录的非线性拉压应力应变响应,以及双相或固有细胞外基质粘弹性响应。虽然许多关节软骨本构模型捕捉到了这些实验响应中的一种或多种,但没有一个本构定律能在同一框架内成功描述软骨的单轴拉伸和压缩响应。本研究的目的是结合莫等人[1980年,《美国机械工程师学会生物医学工程杂志》,第102卷,第73 - 84页]双相理论先前提出的两个扩展,以纳入拉压非线性以及软骨固体基质的固有粘弹性。索尔茨和阿泰希安[2000年,《美国机械工程师学会生物医学工程杂志》,第122卷,第576 - 586页]提出的基于库尔尼尔等人[1995年,《弹性杂志》,第37卷,第1 - 38页]引入的双模量应力应变本构定律的双相锥状线性弹性模型,以及采用冯[1981年,《生物力学:生物组织的力学特性》,施普林格出版社,纽约]准线性粘弹性模型的马克[1986年,《美国机械工程师学会生物医学工程杂志》,第108卷,第123 - 130页]双相多孔粘弹性模型,被合并到一个单一模型中,以分析软骨对标准测试配置的响应。将结果与文献中的实验数据进行比较,发现当适当考虑与流动相关和与流动无关的粘弹性效应以及拉压非线性时,可以实现对关节软骨在应力松弛和动态加载下的压缩和拉伸实验的同时预测。