Büttner Christin, Lisee Caroline, Bjornsen Elizabeth, Buck Ashley, Favoreto Natália, Creighton Alexander, Kamath Ganesh, Spang Jeffrey, Franz Jason R, Blackburn Troy, Pietrosimone Brian
Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Institute of Human Movement Science and Health, Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany.
J Orthop Res. 2025 Feb;43(2):322-336. doi: 10.1002/jor.26001. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
The purpose of this study was to compare gait biomechanics between limbs and to matched uninjured controls (i.e., sex, age, and body mass index) preoperatively and at 2, 4, 6, and 12 months following primary unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Functional mixed effects models were used to identify differences in gait biomechanics throughout the stance phase between the a) ACLR limb and uninvolved limb, b) ACLR limb and controls, and c) uninvolved limb and controls. Compared with the uninvolved limb, the ACLR limb demonstrated lesser knee extension moment (KEM; within 8-37% range of stance) during early stance as well as lesser knee flexion moment (KFM; 45-84%) and greater knee flexion angle (KFA; 43-90%) during mid- to late stance at all timepoints. Compared with controls, the ACLR limb demonstrated lesser vertical ground reaction force (vGRF; 5-26%), lesser KEM (7-47%), and lesser knee adduction moment (KAM; 12-35%) during early stance as well as greater vGRF (39-63%) and greater KFA (34-95%) during mid- to late stance at all timepoints. Compared with controls, the uninvolved limb demonstrated lesser KFA (1-56%) and lesser KEM (12-54%) during early to mid-stance at all timepoints. While gait becomes more symmetrical over the first 12 months post-ACLR, the ACLR and uninvolved limbs both demonstrate persistent aberrant gait biomechanics compared to controls. Biomechanical waveforms throughout stance can be generally described as less dynamic following ACL injury and ACLR compared with uninjured controls.
本研究的目的是比较原发性单侧前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)术前以及术后2、4、6和12个月时,患侧肢体与相匹配的未受伤对照者(即性别、年龄和体重指数)之间的步态生物力学。使用功能混合效应模型来确定在整个站立阶段,a)ACLR肢体与未受累肢体、b)ACLR肢体与对照者、c)未受累肢体与对照者之间步态生物力学的差异。与未受累肢体相比,在所有时间点,ACLR肢体在站立早期表现出较小的膝关节伸展力矩(KEM;在站立阶段的8 - 37%范围内),在站立中晚期表现出较小的膝关节屈曲力矩(KFM;45 - 84%)和较大的膝关节屈曲角度(KFA;43 - 90%)。与对照者相比,在所有时间点,ACLR肢体在站立早期表现出较小的垂直地面反作用力(vGRF;5 - 26%)、较小的KEM(7 - 47%)和较小的膝关节内收力矩(KAM;12 - 35%),在站立中晚期表现出较大的vGRF(39 - 63%)和较大的KFA(34 - 95%)。与对照者相比,未受累肢体在所有时间点的站立早期至中期表现出较小的KFA(1 - 56%)和较小的KEM(12 - 54%)。虽然在ACLR后的前12个月步态变得更加对称,但与对照者相比,ACLR肢体和未受累肢体均表现出持续异常的步态生物力学。与未受伤的对照者相比,ACLR损伤和ACLR后的整个站立阶段生物力学波形通常表现为动态性较低。