• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微卫星不稳定性筛查作为检测遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌方法的成本效益

Cost-effectiveness of microsatellite instability screening as a method for detecting hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

作者信息

Ramsey S D, Clarke L, Etzioni R, Higashi M, Berry K, Urban N

机构信息

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue North (MP-900), Box 19024, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2001 Oct 16;135(8 Pt 1):577-88. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-8_part_1-200110160-00008.

DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-135-8_part_1-200110160-00008
PMID:11601929
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The National Cancer Institute has published consensus guidelines for universal screening for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) in patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the cost-effectiveness of screening compared with standard care in eligible patients with colorectal cancer and their siblings and children.

DESIGN

Cost-effectiveness analysis.

DATA SOURCES

National colorectal cancer registry data, the Creighton International Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Registry, Medicare claims records, and published literature.

TARGET POPULATION

Patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer and their siblings and children.

TIME HORIZON

Lifetime (varies depending on age at screening).

PERSPECTIVE

Societal.

INTERVENTIONS

Initial office-based screening to determine eligibility (based on personal and family cancer history), followed by tumor testing for microsatellite instability. Those with microsatellite instability were offered genetic testing for HNPCC. Siblings and children of patients with cancer and the HNPCC mutation were offered genetic testing, and those who were found to carry the mutation received lifelong colorectal cancer screening.

MEASUREMENTS

Life-years gained.

RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: When only the patients with cancer were considered, cost-effectiveness of screening was $42 210 per life-year gained. When patients with cancer and their siblings and children were considered together, cost-effectiveness increased to $7556 per life-year gained.

RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

The model was most sensitive to the estimated survival gain from screening siblings and children, to the prevalence of HNPCC mutations among patients with newly diagnosed cancer, and to the discount rate. In probabilistic analysis, the 90% CI for the cost-effectiveness of screening patients with cancer plus their relatives was $4874 to $21 576 per life-year gained.

CONCLUSION

Screening patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer for HNPCC is cost-effective, especially if the benefits to their immediate relatives are considered.

摘要

背景

美国国立癌症研究所已发布关于对新诊断为结直肠癌的患者进行遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌(HNPCC)普遍筛查的共识指南。

目的

确定在符合条件的结直肠癌患者及其兄弟姐妹和子女中,筛查与标准治疗相比的成本效益。

设计

成本效益分析。

数据来源

国家结直肠癌登记数据、克里顿国际遗传性结直肠癌登记处、医疗保险理赔记录以及已发表的文献。

目标人群

新诊断为结直肠癌的患者及其兄弟姐妹和子女。

时间范围

终身(因筛查时年龄而异)。

视角

社会视角。

干预措施

最初在门诊进行筛查以确定是否符合条件(基于个人和家族癌症病史),随后进行肿瘤微卫星不稳定性检测。对微卫星不稳定的患者进行HNPCC基因检测。癌症患者以及携带HNPCC突变的患者的兄弟姐妹和子女接受基因检测,被发现携带突变的人接受终身结直肠癌筛查。

测量指标

获得的生命年数。

基础病例分析结果

仅考虑癌症患者时,筛查的成本效益为每获得一个生命年42210美元。当将癌症患者及其兄弟姐妹和子女一起考虑时,成本效益增至每获得一个生命年7556美元。

敏感性分析结果

该模型对筛查兄弟姐妹和子女估计的生存获益、新诊断癌症患者中HNPCC突变的患病率以及贴现率最为敏感。在概率分析中,筛查癌症患者及其亲属的成本效益的90%置信区间为每获得一个生命年4874美元至21576美元。

结论

对新诊断为结直肠癌的患者进行HNPCC筛查具有成本效益,特别是如果考虑对其直系亲属的益处。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of microsatellite instability screening as a method for detecting hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.微卫星不稳定性筛查作为检测遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌方法的成本效益
Ann Intern Med. 2001 Oct 16;135(8 Pt 1):577-88. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-8_part_1-200110160-00008.
2
Summaries for patients. Cost-effectiveness of screening for microsatellite instability to detect hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.患者摘要。检测遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌的微卫星不稳定性筛查的成本效益。
Ann Intern Med. 2001 Oct 16;135(8 Pt 1):S-48. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-8_part_1-200110160-00004.
3
Cost effectiveness of a new strategy to identify HNPCC patients.一种识别遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌(HNPCC)患者新策略的成本效益
Gut. 2005 Jan;54(1):97-102. doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.039123.
4
Strategies to identify the Lynch syndrome among patients with colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.结直肠癌患者中林奇综合征的识别策略:成本效益分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 19;155(2):69-79. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00002.
5
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: diagnostic strategies and their implications.遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌:诊断策略及其影响。
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007 May(150):1-180.
6
Accuracy of revised Bethesda guidelines, microsatellite instability, and immunohistochemistry for the identification of patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.修订的贝塞斯达指南、微卫星不稳定性及免疫组织化学在遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌患者识别中的准确性
JAMA. 2005 Apr 27;293(16):1986-94. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.16.1986.
7
Comparison of selection strategies for genetic testing of patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma: effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌患者基因检测选择策略的比较:有效性和成本效益
Cancer. 2002 Nov 1;95(9):1848-56. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10910.
8
Antibody-based screening for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma compared with microsatellite analysis and sequencing.基于抗体的遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌筛查与微卫星分析和测序的比较
Cancer. 2002 Dec 1;95(11):2422-30. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10979.
9
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: preventive management.
Cancer Treat Rev. 2003 Dec;29(6):461-70. doi: 10.1016/s0305-7372(03)00084-7.
10
Genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌的基因检测
Am Surg. 2003 May;69(5):387-91; discussion 391-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Hereditary colorectal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer: comprehensive review.遗传性结直肠、胃和胰腺肿瘤:全面综述。
BJS Open. 2023 May 5;7(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad023.
2
Low Referral Rate for Genetic Testing in Racially and Ethnically Diverse Patients Despite Universal Colorectal Cancer Screening.尽管普遍开展了结直肠癌筛查,但在不同种族和民族的患者中,遗传检测的转诊率仍然较低。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Dec;16(12):1911-1918.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.08.038. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
3
Which Lynch syndrome screening programs could be implemented in the "real world"? A systematic review of economic evaluations.
哪些林奇综合征筛查方案可以在“现实世界”中实施?一项经济评估的系统综述。
Genet Med. 2018 Oct;20(10):1131-1144. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.244. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
4
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Different Genetic Testing Strategies for Lynch Syndrome in Taiwan.台湾林奇综合征不同基因检测策略的成本效益分析
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 2;11(8):e0160599. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160599. eCollection 2016.
5
Universal Versus Targeted Screening for Lynch Syndrome: Comparing Ascertainment and Costs Based on Clinical Experience.林奇综合征的通用筛查与靶向筛查:基于临床经验比较确诊率和成本
Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Oct;61(10):2887-2895. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4218-y. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
6
Cost-effectiveness of routine screening for Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer patients up to 70 years of age.70岁及以下结直肠癌患者林奇综合征常规筛查的成本效益
Genet Med. 2016 Oct;18(10):966-73. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.206. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
7
Economic evidence on identifying clinically actionable findings with whole-genome sequencing: a scoping review.关于通过全基因组测序识别临床可操作结果的经济学证据:一项范围综述。
Genet Med. 2016 Feb;18(2):111-6. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.69. Epub 2015 May 21.
8
A model-based assessment of the cost-utility of strategies to identify Lynch syndrome in early-onset colorectal cancer patients.基于模型的评估:用于识别早发性结直肠癌患者林奇综合征的策略的成本-效用。
BMC Cancer. 2015 Apr 25;15:313. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1254-5.
9
Economic evaluation of genetic screening for Lynch syndrome in Germany.德国林奇综合征遗传筛查的经济评价。
Genet Med. 2015 Oct;17(10):765-73. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.190. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
10
Comparative effectiveness of next generation genomic sequencing for disease diagnosis: design of a randomized controlled trial in patients with colorectal cancer/polyposis syndromes.下一代基因组测序用于疾病诊断的比较有效性:一项针对结直肠癌/息肉病综合征患者的随机对照试验设计
Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Sep;39(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.06.016. Epub 2014 Jul 3.