• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国林奇综合征遗传筛查的经济评价。

Economic evaluation of genetic screening for Lynch syndrome in Germany.

机构信息

Institute for Health Economics and Health Care Management, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany.

Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Campus Innenstadt, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2015 Oct;17(10):765-73. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.190. Epub 2015 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1038/gim.2014.190
PMID:25569434
Abstract

PURPOSE

Lynch syndrome (LS) screening among patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer can decrease mortality in their affected first-degree relatives. In Germany, it is not yet clinical practice and the cost-effectiveness of different testing strategies is unknown.

METHODS

We developed a decision-analytic model to analyze the cost-effectiveness of LS screening from the perspective of the German Statutory Health Insurance system. A total of 22 testing strategies considering family-history assessment, analysis of tumor samples (i.e., immunohistochemistry (IHC), microsatellite instability, and BRAF mutation testing) and genetic sequencing were analyzed. Life-years gained in relatives by closed-meshed colonoscopy and aspirin prophylaxis were estimated by Markov models. Uncertainty was assessed deterministically and probabilistically.

RESULTS

On average, detected mutation carriers gained 0.52 life-years (undiscounted: 1.34) by increased prevention. Most strategies were dominated, with three exceptions: family assessment by the Bethesda criteria followed by IHC and BRAF testing and genetic sequencing; IHC and BRAF testing and genetic sequencing; and direct sequencing of all index patients. Their incremental cost-effectiveness was [euro ]77,268, [euro ]253,258, and [euro ]4,188,036 per life-year gained, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results were less favorable than those of previous models. Chemoprevention appears to provide comparably low additional benefit and improves cost-effectiveness only slightly.

摘要

目的

对新诊断结直肠癌患者进行林奇综合征(LS)筛查,可以降低其一级亲属的死亡率。在德国,这尚未成为临床实践,不同检测策略的成本效益尚不清楚。

方法

我们开发了一种决策分析模型,从德国法定健康保险系统的角度分析 LS 筛查的成本效益。总共分析了 22 种检测策略,包括家族史评估、肿瘤样本分析(即免疫组织化学(IHC)、微卫星不稳定性和 BRAF 突变检测)和基因测序。通过马尔可夫模型估计了通过密网结肠镜检查和阿司匹林预防在亲属中获得的生命年数。通过确定性和概率性评估来确定不确定性。

结果

平均而言,通过增加预防措施,检测到的突变携带者获得了 0.52 个生命年(未贴现:1.34 个)。大多数策略都被主导,只有三个例外:贝塞斯达标准的家族评估,然后是 IHC 和 BRAF 检测以及基因测序;IHC 和 BRAF 检测以及基因测序;以及所有索引患者的直接测序。它们的增量成本效益分别为每获得一个生命年[欧元]77,268、[欧元]253,258 和[欧元]4,188,036。

结论

结果不如以前的模型有利。化学预防似乎提供了相对较低的额外益处,并且仅略微提高了成本效益。

相似文献

1
Economic evaluation of genetic screening for Lynch syndrome in Germany.德国林奇综合征遗传筛查的经济评价。
Genet Med. 2015 Oct;17(10):765-73. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.190. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
2
Strategies to identify the Lynch syndrome among patients with colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.结直肠癌患者中林奇综合征的识别策略:成本效益分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 19;155(2):69-79. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00002.
3
Lethal privacy: Quantifying life years lost if the right to informational self-determination guides genetic screening for Lynch syndrome.致命的隐私:如果信息自决权指导林奇综合征的基因筛查,量化所损失的生命年数。
Health Policy. 2019 Oct;123(10):1004-1010. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.08.015. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
4
A systematic review and economic evaluation of diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome.林奇综合征诊断策略的系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Sep;18(58):1-406. doi: 10.3310/hta18580.
5
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Different Genetic Testing Strategies for Lynch Syndrome in Taiwan.台湾林奇综合征不同基因检测策略的成本效益分析
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 2;11(8):e0160599. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160599. eCollection 2016.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of genetic diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome in Italy.意大利林奇综合征遗传诊断策略的成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 1;15(7):e0235038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235038. eCollection 2020.
7
Comparative effectiveness of screening strategies for Lynch syndrome.林奇综合征筛查策略的比较有效性
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Mar 20;107(4). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv005. Print 2015 Apr.
8
Molecular testing for Lynch syndrome in people with colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.结直肠癌患者林奇综合征的分子检测:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Sep;21(51):1-238. doi: 10.3310/hta21510.
9
Cost-effectiveness of routine screening for Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer patients up to 70 years of age.70岁及以下结直肠癌患者林奇综合征常规筛查的成本效益
Genet Med. 2016 Oct;18(10):966-73. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.206. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
10
A model-based assessment of the cost-utility of strategies to identify Lynch syndrome in early-onset colorectal cancer patients.基于模型的评估:用于识别早发性结直肠癌患者林奇综合征的策略的成本-效用。
BMC Cancer. 2015 Apr 25;15:313. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1254-5.

引用本文的文献

1
[Gender-specific differences in the development of colorectal cancer in Lynch syndrome patients-A systematic review].[林奇综合征患者结直肠癌发生中的性别特异性差异——一项系统综述]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2024 Sep;95(9):696-708. doi: 10.1007/s00104-024-02159-x. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
2
Economic evaluations of predictive genetic testing: A scoping review.预测性基因检测的经济学评价:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 2;18(8):e0276572. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276572. eCollection 2023.
3
MyLynch: A Patient-Facing Clinical Decision Support Tool for Genetically-Guided Personalized Medicine in Lynch Syndrome.

本文引用的文献

1
Germany: Health system review.德国:卫生系统综述。
Health Syst Transit. 2014;16(2):1-296, xxi.
2
Role of aspirin in cancer prevention.阿司匹林在癌症预防中的作用。
Curr Oncol Rep. 2013 Dec;15(6):533-40. doi: 10.1007/s11912-013-0351-3.
3
Uptake of genetic testing by relatives of lynch syndrome probands: a systematic review.林奇综合征先证者亲属对基因检测的接受度:系统评价。
MyLynch:一种面向林奇综合征患者的临床决策支持工具,用于基因指导下的个性化医疗。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 6;15(2):391. doi: 10.3390/cancers15020391.
4
Cost-effectiveness of population-wide genomic screening for Lynch syndrome in the United States.美国人群中林奇综合征的基因组筛查的成本效益分析。
Genet Med. 2022 May;24(5):1017-1026. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.01.017. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
5
A systematic review of the methodological quality of economic evaluations in genetic screening and testing for monogenic disorders.对单基因疾病遗传筛查和检测的经济评估方法学质量的系统评价。
Genet Med. 2022 Feb;24(2):262-288. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.10.008. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
6
Swiss cost-effectiveness analysis of universal screening for Lynch syndrome of patients with colorectal cancer followed by cascade genetic testing of relatives.瑞士针对林奇综合征的成本效益分析:对结直肠癌患者进行普遍筛查,然后对亲属进行级联遗传检测。
J Med Genet. 2022 Sep;59(9):924-930. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2021-108062. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
7
Cost-effectiveness analysis of genetic diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome in Italy.意大利林奇综合征遗传诊断策略的成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 1;15(7):e0235038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235038. eCollection 2020.
8
Cost-effectiveness of Active Identification and Subsequent Colonoscopy Surveillance of Lynch Syndrome Cases.林奇综合征病例的主动识别及其随后结肠镜监测的成本效益。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Nov;18(12):2760-2767.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.10.021. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
9
Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer and Cancer Syndromes: Recent Basic and Clinical Discoveries.遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌及癌症综合征:近期基础与临床研究发现
J Oncol. 2018 Apr 23;2018:3979135. doi: 10.1155/2018/3979135. eCollection 2018.
10
Personalized medicine in colorectal cancer diagnosis and treatment: a systematic review of health economic evaluations.结直肠癌诊断与治疗中的个性化医疗:卫生经济评估的系统综述
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2018 Jan 22;16:2. doi: 10.1186/s12962-018-0085-z. eCollection 2018.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Sep;11(9):1093-100. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.04.044. Epub 2013 May 10.
4
Revised guidelines for the clinical management of Lynch syndrome (HNPCC): recommendations by a group of European experts.林奇综合征(HNPCC)临床管理的修订指南:一组欧洲专家的建议。
Gut. 2013 Jun;62(6):812-23. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-304356. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
5
Improving identification of lynch syndrome patients: a comparison of research data with clinical records.提高林奇综合征患者识别率:研究数据与临床记录的比较。
Int J Cancer. 2013 Jun 15;132(12):2876-83. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27978. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
6
Identification of Lynch syndrome among patients with colorectal cancer.结直肠癌患者中林奇综合征的鉴定。
JAMA. 2012 Oct 17;308(15):1555-65. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.13088.
7
Influence of patient preferences on the cost-effectiveness of screening for lynch syndrome.患者偏好对林奇综合征筛查的成本效益的影响。
J Oncol Pract. 2012 May;8(3 Suppl):e24s-30s. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000535.
8
Microsatellite instability and therapeutic consequences in colorectal cancer.结直肠癌中的微卫星不稳定性及其治疗后果。
Dig Dis. 2012;30(3):304-9. doi: 10.1159/000337003. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
9
Predictive genetic testing of first degree relatives of mutation carriers is a cost-effective strategy in preventing hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer in Singapore.对突变携带者一级亲属进行预测性基因检测,是预防新加坡遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌的一种具有成本效益的策略。
Fam Cancer. 2012 Jun;11(2):279-89. doi: 10.1007/s10689-012-9513-y.
10
Long-term effect of aspirin on cancer risk in carriers of hereditary colorectal cancer: an analysis from the CAPP2 randomised controlled trial.遗传性结直肠癌携带者中阿司匹林对癌症风险的长期影响:来自 CAPP2 随机对照试验的分析。
Lancet. 2011 Dec 17;378(9809):2081-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61049-0. Epub 2011 Oct 27.