• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Pcons:一种基于神经网络的一致性预测器,可提高折叠识别能力。

Pcons: a neural-network-based consensus predictor that improves fold recognition.

作者信息

Lundström J, Rychlewski L, Bujnicki J, Elofsson A

机构信息

Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, Stockholm University, SE 10691 Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Protein Sci. 2001 Nov;10(11):2354-62. doi: 10.1110/ps.08501.

DOI:10.1110/ps.08501
PMID:11604541
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2374055/
Abstract

During recent years many protein fold recognition methods have been developed, based on different algorithms and using various kinds of information. To examine the performance of these methods several evaluation experiments have been conducted. These include blind tests in CASP/CAFASP, large scale benchmarks, and long-term, continuous assessment with newly solved protein structures. These studies confirm the expectation that for different targets different methods produce the best predictions, and the final prediction accuracy could be improved if the available methods were combined in a perfect manner. In this article a neural-network-based consensus predictor, Pcons, is presented that attempts this task. Pcons attempts to select the best model out of those produced by six prediction servers, each using different methods. Pcons translates the confidence scores reported by each server into uniformly scaled values corresponding to the expected accuracy of each model. The translated scores as well as the similarity between models produced by different servers is used in the final selection. According to the analysis based on two unrelated sets of newly solved proteins, Pcons outperforms any single server by generating approximately 8%-10% more correct predictions. Furthermore, the specificity of Pcons is significantly higher than for any individual server. From analyzing different input data to Pcons it can be shown that the improvement is mainly attributable to measurement of the similarity between the different models. Pcons is freely accessible for the academic community through the protein structure-prediction metaserver at http://bioinfo.pl/meta/.

摘要

近年来,基于不同算法并利用各种信息,已经开发出了许多蛋白质折叠识别方法。为了检验这些方法的性能,已经进行了若干评估实验。这些实验包括在CASP/CAFASP中的盲测、大规模基准测试以及利用新解析的蛋白质结构进行的长期连续评估。这些研究证实了这样的预期:对于不同的目标,不同的方法能产生最佳预测结果,并且如果以理想的方式组合现有方法,最终的预测准确性可以得到提高。在本文中,提出了一种基于神经网络的一致性预测器Pcons来尝试这项任务。Pcons试图从六个预测服务器所产生的模型中选出最佳模型,每个服务器都使用不同的方法。Pcons将每个服务器报告的置信度分数转换为与每个模型的预期准确性相对应的统一缩放值。最终选择时会使用转换后的分数以及不同服务器产生的模型之间的相似性。根据基于两组不相关的新解析蛋白质的分析,Pcons通过产生比任何单个服务器多约8%-10%的正确预测而表现更优。此外,Pcons的特异性明显高于任何单个服务器。通过分析输入到Pcons的不同数据可以表明,这种改进主要归因于对不同模型之间相似性的度量。学术界可以通过http://bioinfo.pl/meta/的蛋白质结构预测元服务器免费使用Pcons。

相似文献

1
Pcons: a neural-network-based consensus predictor that improves fold recognition.Pcons:一种基于神经网络的一致性预测器,可提高折叠识别能力。
Protein Sci. 2001 Nov;10(11):2354-62. doi: 10.1110/ps.08501.
2
Pcons.net: protein structure prediction meta server.Pcons.net:蛋白质结构预测元服务器。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 Jul;35(Web Server issue):W369-74. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm319. Epub 2007 Jun 21.
3
Structure prediction meta server.结构预测元服务器。
Bioinformatics. 2001 Aug;17(8):750-1. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.750.
4
Pcons5: combining consensus, structural evaluation and fold recognition scores.Pcons5:结合共识、结构评估和折叠识别分数。
Bioinformatics. 2005 Dec 1;21(23):4248-54. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti702. Epub 2005 Oct 4.
5
Automatic consensus-based fold recognition using Pcons, ProQ, and Pmodeller.使用Pcons、ProQ和Pmodeller基于共识的自动折叠识别。
Proteins. 2003;53 Suppl 6:534-41. doi: 10.1002/prot.10536.
6
CAFASP-1: critical assessment of fully automated structure prediction methods.CAFASP-1:全自动结构预测方法的批判性评估
Proteins. 1999;Suppl 3:209-17. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(1999)37:3+<209::aid-prot27>3.3.co;2-p.
7
CAFASP2: the second critical assessment of fully automated structure prediction methods.CAFASP2:全自动结构预测方法的第二次关键评估
Proteins. 2001;Suppl 5:171-83. doi: 10.1002/prot.10036.
8
3D-SHOTGUN: a novel, cooperative, fold-recognition meta-predictor.3D-霰弹枪:一种新型的、协作式的折叠识别元预测器。
Proteins. 2003 May 15;51(3):434-41. doi: 10.1002/prot.10357.
9
Assessment of global and local model quality in CASP8 using Pcons and ProQ.使用 Pcons 和 ProQ 评估 CASP8 中的全局和局部模型质量。
Proteins. 2009;77 Suppl 9:167-72. doi: 10.1002/prot.22476.
10
Improved predictions by Pcons.net using multiple templates.Pcons.net 利用多个模板提高预测能力。
Bioinformatics. 2011 Feb 1;27(3):426-7. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq664. Epub 2010 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Recent advances and challenges in protein complex model accuracy estimation.蛋白质复合物模型准确性评估的最新进展与挑战
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024 Apr 21;23:1824-1832. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.04.049. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Protein quality assessment with a loss function designed for high-quality decoys.使用专为高质量诱饵设计的损失函数进行蛋白质质量评估。
Front Bioinform. 2023 Oct 17;3:1198218. doi: 10.3389/fbinf.2023.1198218. eCollection 2023.
3
A gated graph transformer for protein complex structure quality assessment and its performance in CASP15.门控图转换器用于蛋白质复合物结构质量评估及其在 CASP15 中的性能。
Bioinformatics. 2023 Jun 30;39(39 Suppl 1):i308-i317. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad203.
4
Estimation of model accuracy by a unique set of features and tree-based regressor.通过一组独特的特征和基于树的回归器来估计模型的准确性。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 18;12(1):14074. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17097-z.
5
ZoomQA: residue-level protein model accuracy estimation with machine learning on sequential and 3D structural features.ZoomQA:基于序列和 3D 结构特征的机器学习的残基水平蛋白质模型准确性估计。
Brief Bioinform. 2022 Jan 17;23(1). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbab384.
6
The evolutionary history of topological variations in the CPA/AT transporters.CPA/AT 转运蛋白拓扑结构变异的进化历史。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Aug 17;17(8):e1009278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009278. eCollection 2021 Aug.
7
Improving protein tertiary structure prediction by deep learning and distance prediction in CASP14.通过深度学习和距离预测改进 CASP14 中的蛋白质三级结构预测。
Proteins. 2022 Jan;90(1):58-72. doi: 10.1002/prot.26186. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
8
Protein model accuracy estimation empowered by deep learning and inter-residue distance prediction in CASP14.基于深度学习和残差距离预测的蛋白质模型准确性估计在 CASP14 中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 25;11(1):10943. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90303-6.
9
Accurate contact-based modelling of repeat proteins predicts the structure of new repeats protein families.准确的基于接触的重复蛋白建模预测了新的重复蛋白家族的结构。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Apr 15;17(4):e1008798. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008798. eCollection 2021 Apr.
10
The accuracy of protein models automatically built into cryo-EM maps with ARP/wARP.利用 ARP/wARP 自动构建的冷冻电镜图谱中的蛋白质模型的准确性。
Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol. 2021 Feb 1;77(Pt 2):142-150. doi: 10.1107/S2059798320016332. Epub 2021 Jan 26.

本文引用的文献

1
LiveBench-2: large-scale automated evaluation of protein structure prediction servers.LiveBench-2:蛋白质结构预测服务器的大规模自动化评估
Proteins. 2001;Suppl 5:184-91. doi: 10.1002/prot.10039.
2
A study of quality measures for protein threading models.蛋白质穿线模型质量度量的研究。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2001;2:5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-2-5. Epub 2001 Aug 1.
3
LiveBench-1: continuous benchmarking of protein structure prediction servers.LiveBench-1:蛋白质结构预测服务器的持续基准测试。
Protein Sci. 2001 Feb;10(2):352-61. doi: 10.1110/ps.40501.
4
MaxSub: an automated measure for the assessment of protein structure prediction quality.MaxSub:一种用于评估蛋白质结构预测质量的自动化度量方法。
Bioinformatics. 2000 Sep;16(9):776-85. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.9.776.
5
Hybrid fold recognition: combining sequence derived properties with evolutionary information.混合折叠识别:将序列衍生特性与进化信息相结合。
Pac Symp Biocomput. 2000:119-30.
6
Enhanced genome annotation using structural profiles in the program 3D-PSSM.在程序3D-PSSM中使用结构概况增强基因组注释。
J Mol Biol. 2000 Jun 2;299(2):499-520. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3741.
7
Large-scale comparison of protein sequence alignment algorithms with structure alignments.蛋白质序列比对算法与结构比对的大规模比较。
Proteins. 2000 Jul 1;40(1):6-22. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(20000701)40:1<6::aid-prot30>3.0.co;2-7.
8
Structure-based evaluation of sequence comparison and fold recognition alignment accuracy.基于结构的序列比对和折叠识别比对准确性评估。
J Mol Biol. 2000 Apr 7;297(4):1003-13. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3615.
9
Comparison of sequence profiles. Strategies for structural predictions using sequence information.序列图谱比较。利用序列信息进行结构预测的策略。
Protein Sci. 2000 Feb;9(2):232-41. doi: 10.1110/ps.9.2.232.
10
Combination of threading potentials and sequence profiles improves fold recognition.穿线势能与序列谱相结合可提高折叠识别能力。
J Mol Biol. 2000 Mar 10;296(5):1319-31. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3541.