Stolz J A, Neely J H
University of Waterloo.
Can J Exp Psychol. 2001 Sep;55(3):219-30. doi: 10.1037/h0087368.
A same-different letter-matching task was used to examine the effects of stimulus intensity on negative priming, which is poorer performance when target letters have been presented as distractor letters on the immediately preceding trial. In Experiment 1, stimulus intensity was manipulated between-participants, whereas in Experiment 2, it varied randomly from trial-to-trial within-participants. In Experiment 1, negative priming was equivalent for both stimulus intensities. In Experiment 2, negative priming effects were larger for repeated intensity stimuli than for nonrepeated intensity stimuli, when stimulus intensity was dim. Furthermore, for repeated intensity stimuli, negative priming effects were enhanced when the overt response required to the stimulus was repeated from prime to probe trial. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that negative priming may be due to memory confusion, rather than to inhibition of the distractor stimuli.
采用相同-不同字母匹配任务来考察刺激强度对负启动效应的影响,负启动效应是指在前一次试验中作为干扰字母呈现的目标字母再次出现时,表现会变差。在实验1中,刺激强度在参与者之间进行操纵,而在实验2中,刺激强度在参与者内部每次试验之间随机变化。在实验1中,两种刺激强度下的负启动效应相当。在实验2中,当刺激强度较暗时,重复强度刺激的负启动效应大于非重复强度刺激。此外,对于重复强度刺激,当从启动试验到探测试验对刺激所需的明显反应重复时,负启动效应会增强。这些结果与以下假设一致,即负启动效应可能是由于记忆混淆,而不是对干扰刺激的抑制。