Frings Christian, Wühr Peter
Faculty of Behavioral Sciences, Department of Psychology, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Mem Cognit. 2007 Apr;35(3):504-13. doi: 10.3758/bf03193290.
Responses to probe targets that have been distractors in a prime display are slower than responses to new targets, a finding called negative priming (NP). The selective attention model, which attributes NP to lingering inhibition of the prime distractor, predicts that NP should occur only when the prime display has disappeared before the probe display is processed. The present study tested this prediction both in easy- and in difficult selection tasks. In Experiments 1, 2, and 3A, target selection was easy, and NP was observed only after prime display offset, regardless of whether offset was manipulated between or within participants. In Experiment 3B, target selection was difficult, and NP was found with and without prime display offset. Experiment 4 replicated the finding of NP without prime display offset in a difficult-selection task. A modified version of the selective attention model can explain the results of the present study. However, we also discuss the results in light of episodic retrieval theory and temporal discrimination theory.
对在启动显示中曾作为干扰项的探测目标的反应,比对新目标的反应要慢,这一发现被称为负启动(NP)。选择性注意模型将NP归因于对启动干扰项的持续抑制,该模型预测,NP应该只在启动显示在探测显示被处理之前消失时才会出现。本研究在简单和困难选择任务中对这一预测进行了测试。在实验1、2和3A中,目标选择很容易,并且只有在启动显示消失后才观察到NP,无论消失是在参与者之间还是参与者内部进行操纵。在实验3B中,目标选择很困难,并且在启动显示消失和未消失的情况下都发现了NP。实验4在困难选择任务中重现了没有启动显示消失时NP的发现。选择性注意模型的一个修改版本可以解释本研究的结果。然而,我们也根据情景检索理论和时间辨别理论来讨论这些结果。