Wang J
Zhonghua Yi Shi Za Zhi. 1996;26(1):56-9.
Having made a textual research on the relation between the two editions of Dan Fang Jing Yuan of Zheng Tong Dao Zang and Zheng Lei Ben Cao, we consider the materials quoted by the latter to be derived from the three-volume Dan Fang Jian Yuan of Dao Zang, while the Dan Fang Jing Yuan from the fourth volume of Qian Gong Jia Geng Zhi Bao Ji Cheng is in fact an apocrypha of Zheng Lei Ben Cao by Song people. The dating of the two books are also studied.
通过对《正统道藏》和《证类本草》两个版本的《丹方精要》之间的关系进行考证,我们认为后者引用的材料源自道藏三卷本《丹方鉴源》,而《钱公甲乙志宝集成》第四卷中的《丹方精要》实际上是宋人对《证类本草》的伪作。此外,还对这两本书的年代进行了研究。