Suppr超能文献

[丹波桂三与森鸥外关于药房与医疗业务分离的文章]

[The essays of Keizou Tanba and Ougai Mori about separation of dispensary from medical practice].

作者信息

Amano H, Kawabuchi M, Tanaka Y, Saitou A, Sugihara M

机构信息

Division of Pharmacy, Tokyo Women's Medical College.

出版信息

Yakushigaku Zasshi. 1994;29(1):9-14.

Abstract

Keizou Tanba wrote an article on separation of dispensary in Chugai-iji-shinpo in June, the year 23 of Meji Era. It was said that separation of dispensary had to be carried out and it brought many advantages. First, a pharmacist can examine the prescription and correct it if there are any mistakes. He will be able to give an advice to a doctor that the side effects will perhaps occur due to preparation of medicine. Secondly, a pharmacist can superintend whether unnecessary medicine is prescribed or not. He will check surplus prescription in such a case that a patients will be cured by observing dietary or exercise. According to Tanba's opinion, if we will get people to know what separation of dispensary is, it is easy to be carried out. Ougai Mori wrote an essay separation of dispensary in the same period. His opinion was opposite, basically. It caused to impose a burden on a patient. As the number of pharmacist were not enough, it was impossible to carry it out. A conflict of opinion also remains among people related to medicine at present. The circumstances on separation of dispensary have not been changing during one hundred years.

摘要

丹波桂蔵于明治二十三年六月在《中外医事新报》上发表了一篇关于药房分离的文章。据说必须进行药房分离,且它带来了许多益处。首先,药剂师可以检查处方,如果有任何错误可以进行纠正。他将能够向医生建议,由于药物配制可能会出现副作用。其次,药剂师可以监督是否开具了不必要的药物。在患者通过饮食或运动调养就能康复的情况下,他会检查多余的处方。按照丹波的观点,如果我们让人们了解药房分离是什么,就很容易实施。森鸥外于同一时期写了一篇关于药房分离的文章。他的观点基本上是相反的。这会给患者带来负担。由于药剂师数量不足,无法实施。目前在医药相关人员中也存在意见冲突。药房分离的情况在一百年间一直没有改变。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验