Van de Kaa D J
Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, The Hague.
Popul Stud (Camb). 1996 Nov;50(3):389-432. doi: 10.1080/0032472031000149546.
This paper reviews half a century of research into the determinants of fertility. It is argued that the quest for the determinants of fertility behaviour and change during that period can best be interpreted as the development of a series of sub-narratives from different disciplinary perspectives and orientations. These are normally based upon the initial narrative of the demographic transition and usually take the form of a verbal theory illustrated by a 'box and arrow' diagram. On occasions formalization has been attempted. Different parts of the initial narrative have been highlighted at different times depending on policy interest, improvements in technical skills, availability of data, changes in social setting, and the degree of satisfaction with the dominant sub-narrative of the day. There is every reason to believe that the research process identified will continue and will lead to a further accumulation of knowledge. In fact, all important variables have probably already been identified. That it will, ultimately, lead to a single, consolidated narrative fully satisfactory for all settings and for all time is, however, highly unlikely.
本文回顾了半个世纪以来对生育率决定因素的研究。有人认为,在这一时期对生育行为及其变化决定因素的探索,最好被理解为从不同学科视角和取向发展出的一系列子叙事。这些通常基于人口转变的初始叙事,并且通常采取由“方框和箭头”图说明的文字理论形式。有时也尝试进行形式化。根据政策兴趣、技术技能的提高、数据的可用性、社会环境的变化以及对当时主导子叙事的满意程度,初始叙事的不同部分在不同时间被突出强调。完全有理由相信所确定的研究过程将继续下去,并将导致知识的进一步积累。事实上,所有重要变量可能已经被识别出来。然而,最终它会导致一个对所有情况和所有时间都完全令人满意的单一、综合叙事,这是极不可能的。