Ito K
Nihon Ishigaku Zasshi. 1996 Mar;42(1):49-59.
Marcello Malpighi (1628-94) was the most important anatomist of Seventeenth-Century Italy. He investigated chiefly the minute structures of living things with the microscope, as his discovery of the capillary vessels of the lung, and his description of the Malpighi-corpuscle of the kidney has showed. Malpighi discusses the role of anatomy in medicine in the "Risposta" to G.G. Sbaraglia's "De recentiorum medicorum" in which it was insisted that anatomical study with the microscope makes no contribution to practical cure. Malpighi's argument for the anatomical study is based on the mechanistic view of nature. He considers living things analogous to machines made up of minute parts, and believes that the cure of diseases must be done as the repair of broken machines. He insists that by the dissection of the bodies of dead patients we should get knowledge of the relation between the change of tissues and the symptom of disease. Naturally it is impossible to explain the cause of disease only by the mechanistic explanation as Malpighi insisted, but his mechanistic view largely influenced the methodology of Morgagni, the father of modern pathological anatomy in the eighteenth century.
马尔切洛·马尔皮基(1628 - 1694)是17世纪意大利最重要的解剖学家。他主要用显微镜研究生物的微观结构,他发现肺的毛细血管以及对肾小体的描述就证明了这一点。马尔皮基在对G.G.斯巴拉利亚的《论近代医学》的“答复”中讨论了解剖学在医学中的作用,在该文中有人坚持认为用显微镜进行解剖学研究对实际治疗没有贡献。马尔皮基支持解剖学研究的论点基于机械论的自然观。他认为生物类似于由微小部分组成的机器,并相信疾病的治疗必须像修理损坏的机器一样进行。他坚持认为通过解剖死者的尸体,我们应该了解组织变化与疾病症状之间的关系。当然,仅靠马尔皮基所坚持的机械论解释不可能解释疾病的原因,但他的机械论观点在很大程度上影响了18世纪现代病理解剖学之父莫尔加尼的方法论。