Hart N
Popul Stud (Camb). 1998 Jul;52(2):215-29. doi: 10.1080/0032472031000150386.
Though it has been the largest component of reproductive mortality since its statutory registration in 1928, stillbirth has received little attention from historical demographers, who have relied on the more orthodox indicator of early human survival changes - "infant mortality". The exclusion of stillbirth hampers demographic analysis, underestimates progress in newborn vitality, and over-privileges post-natal causes in theoretical explanation. A case is made for estimating stillbirth before 1928 as a ratio of early neonatal death, and for employing perinatal mortality as an historical indicator of female health status. The long-run trend of reproductive mortality (encompassing mature foetal and live born infant death during the first eleven months) reveals a substantial decline in perinatal causes in the first industrial century (1750-1850), implying a major concurrent improvement in the nutritional status of child bearers. Reproductive mortality is a more complete indicator of death in infancy. It offers demographers a means of fracturing the fertility versus mortality dualism and a potential purchase on gender as a demographic variable, while re-opening the case on mortality in the demographic dynamic of the world we have lost.
自1928年法定登记以来,死产一直是生殖死亡率的最大组成部分,但历史人口统计学家对其关注甚少,他们依赖早期人类生存变化的更正统指标——“婴儿死亡率”。排除死产妨碍了人口分析,低估了新生儿活力方面的进展,并在理论解释中过度重视产后原因。有人主张将1928年以前的死产估计为早期新生儿死亡的比例,并采用围产期死亡率作为女性健康状况的历史指标。生殖死亡率(包括成熟胎儿和出生后头十一个月内活产婴儿的死亡)的长期趋势显示,在第一个工业世纪(1750 - 1850年)围产期原因大幅下降,这意味着同时期育龄妇女营养状况有重大改善。生殖死亡率是婴儿期死亡更完整的指标。它为人口统计学家提供了一种打破生育与死亡二元论的方法,以及将性别作为人口变量进行潜在研究的途径,同时重新审视我们已经失去的世界人口动态中的死亡率问题。