Starkey P
Department of History, University of Liverpool, UK.
Soc Hist Med. 1998 Dec;11(3):421-41. doi: 10.1093/shm/11.3.421.
It has sometimes been assumed that the Report of the Seebohm Committee on the Local Authority and Allied Personal Social Services of 1968 and subsequent Local Authority (Social Services) Reorganization signalled a reduction in the influence of Medical Officers of Health in the care of poor and disorganized families and an increase in that of social workers. This article considers the role of Medical Officers of Health in the care of such families in the period after the Second World War, and their relationship with one of the key voluntary social work agencies in the field, Pacifist Service Units/Family Service Units. By examining the shift in responsibility from public health doctors to social workers and using the Bristol Family Service Unit as a case study, it argues that in many areas the Children and Young Persons Act of 1963 was used formally to transfer responsibility for such families to the Children's Departments and that the process was complete before the Seebohm Committee reported in 1968. It also suggests that those families in difficulty who remained the responsibility of the Public Health Department, and who were thought to have increased in number during the course of the 1960s, presented health visitors and public health doctors with a different range of problems, although they continued to be labelled problem families.
人们有时认为,1968年西博姆委员会关于地方当局及相关个人社会服务的报告以及随后的地方当局(社会服务)重组,标志着卫生医疗官员在照顾贫困和无序家庭方面的影响力有所下降,而社会工作者的影响力有所上升。本文探讨了第二次世界大战后卫生医疗官员在照顾此类家庭中的作用,以及他们与该领域一个关键的志愿社会工作机构——和平主义服务单位/家庭服务单位的关系。通过研究从公共卫生医生到社会工作者的责任转移,并以布里斯托尔家庭服务单位为例进行分析,本文认为在许多地区,1963年的《儿童和青少年法案》被正式用于将此类家庭的责任转移至儿童部门,且这一过程在1968年西博姆委员会报告之前就已完成。本文还指出,那些仍由公共卫生部门负责的困难家庭,且被认为在20世纪60年代数量有所增加,给健康访视员和公共卫生医生带来了一系列不同的问题,尽管这些家庭仍被贴上问题家庭的标签。