Benschop R
Sci Context. 1998 Spring;11(1):23-50. doi: 10.1017/s0269889700002908.
This essay addresses the historiographical question of how to study scientific instruments and the connections between them without rigidly determining the boundaries of the object under historical scrutiny beforehand. To do this, I will explore an episode in the early history of the tachistoscope--defined, among other things, as an instrument for the brief exposure of visual stimuli in experimental psychology. After looking at the tachistoscope described by physiologist Volkmann in 1859, I will turn to the gravity chronometer, constructed by Cattell at Wundt's Leipzig institute of psychology in the 1880s. Taking Wittgenstein's notion of family resemblances as a methodological suggestion to travel from one member to another to find out just how members relate to one another, I will investigate part of the family to which both the trachistoscope and the gravity chronometer turn out to belong. A detailed analysis of these instruments, using both historical sources and historical accounts of psychological instruments, may demonstrate that the instrument is not a standard package that, if well applied, will simply secure good results. Each package needs to be assembled again and again; the particular package that is assembled may differ on different occasions. Thus an alternative is developed to an understanding of instruments as univocally functioning material means.
本文探讨了一个史学问题,即如何研究科学仪器以及它们之间的联系,而无需事先严格界定历史审视对象的边界。为此,我将探讨速示器早期历史中的一个片段——速示器除其他功能外,还被定义为实验心理学中用于短暂呈现视觉刺激的仪器。在考察了生理学家福尔克曼于1859年描述的速示器之后,我将转向卡特尔于19世纪80年代在冯特的莱比锡心理研究所制造的重力计时器。以维特根斯坦的家族相似性概念作为一种方法论建议,即从一个成员转向另一个成员,以查明成员之间的相互关系,我将研究速示器和重力计时器所属的部分家族。利用历史资料和心理仪器的历史记载对这些仪器进行详细分析,可能会表明仪器并非一个标准的套装,只要应用得当就能确保取得好的结果。每个套装都需要反复组装;在不同场合组装的特定套装可能会有所不同。因此,一种不同于将仪器理解为具有单一功能的物质手段的观点得以形成。