Ebrahimnejad H
The Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, London, UK.
Med Secoli. 1999;11(1):167-96.
In a description of a historical case in 19th Century Persia, this article endeavours to show how changes in medical thought occurred. It argues that Medical Modernisation was apparent in the internal changes in traditional medicine. While cholera was frequently recorded, as an epidemic disease, over several centuries in the Persian Medical literature, why and how it became at this period, before contact with Western medicine, under close scrutiny by the traditional medicine. This new scrutiny is illustrated in the writings of Shirazi, a traditional court doctor, who endeavoured to describe cholera, diarrhoea and plague. In doing this, he introduced a significant change in the meanings of vaba and ta'un (generic terms attributed to any epidemic disease). Shirazi used them specifically to mean what we understood as cholera, for the former, and plague for the latter. The internal change in traditional medical thought, together with the awakening of socio-political consciousness regarding the spread of epidemics, were the main factors clearing the path to a natural integration of Western medicine in 19th century Iran.
在对19世纪波斯一个历史病例的描述中,本文力图展现医学思想是如何发生变化的。文章认为,医学现代化在传统医学的内部变化中显而易见。虽然霍乱在波斯医学文献中作为一种流行病被频繁记录了几个世纪,但为何以及如何在这个时期,即在与西方医学接触之前,受到传统医学的密切审视。传统宫廷医生希拉齐的著作中体现了这种新的审视,他力图描述霍乱、腹泻和瘟疫。在此过程中,他对vaba和ta'un(归因于任何流行病的通用术语)的含义进行了重大改变。希拉齐将前者专门用来表示我们所理解的霍乱,后者表示瘟疫。传统医学思想的内部变化,以及社会政治层面对于流行病传播意识的觉醒,是19世纪伊朗为西方医学的自然融合扫清道路的主要因素。