Sheard S
Department of Public Health and School of History, University of Liverpool, UK.
Soc Hist Med. 2000 Apr;13(1):63-85. doi: 10.1093/shm/13.1.63.
Researh on sanitary reform in nineteenth-century Britain has focused mainly on the introduction of large-sanitary infrastructure, especially waterworks and sewage systems. Other sanitary measures such as the provision of public baths and wash-houses have been ignored, or discussed in the limited context of working-class responses to middle-class sanitarianism. Yet by 1915 public baths and wash-houses were to be found in nearly every British town and city. A detailed analysis of these 'enterprises' can provide a useful way of understanding the changing priorities of public health professionals and urban authorities as well as the changing attitudes of the working classes. Connections between personal cleanliness and disease evolved during the century, particularly after the formation of germ theory in the 1880s. This paper demonstrates how the introduction of public baths and wash-houses in Liverpool, Belfast, and Glasgow was initially a direct response to sanitary reform campaigns. It also shows that the explicit public health ideology of these developments was constantly compromised by implicit concerns about municipal finance and the potential profit that such enterprises could generate. This city-based analysis shows that this conflict hindered the full sanitary benefit which these schemes potentially offered.
对19世纪英国卫生改革的研究主要集中在大型卫生基础设施的引入上,尤其是自来水厂和污水处理系统。其他卫生措施,如提供公共浴室和洗衣房,则被忽视了,或者仅在工人阶级对中产阶级卫生主义的反应这一有限背景下进行了讨论。然而,到1915年,几乎在英国的每个城镇都能找到公共浴室和洗衣房。对这些“企业”进行详细分析,可以为理解公共卫生专业人员和城市当局不断变化的优先事项以及工人阶级不断变化的态度提供一种有益的方式。个人清洁与疾病之间的联系在这一世纪中不断演变,尤其是在19世纪80年代细菌理论形成之后。本文展示了利物浦、贝尔法斯特和格拉斯哥公共浴室和洗衣房的引入最初是如何直接回应卫生改革运动的。它还表明,这些发展中明确的公共卫生理念不断受到对市政财政以及此类企业可能产生的潜在利润的隐性担忧的影响。这种基于城市的分析表明,这种冲突阻碍了这些计划可能带来的全面卫生效益。