Croce P J
Department of American Studies, Stetson University, DeLand, Florida 32720, USA.
Hist Psychol. 1999 Nov;2(4):302-23. doi: 10.1037/1093-4510.2.4.302.
In the 5 years before 1878, when his career in psychology was becoming established, William James wrote a series of notes and reviews assessing the work of many of the pioneers in the new field. Adopting a public and confident voice, even while he was privately still uncertain and searching, James criticized the dogmatism of positivist and idealist claims to the study of the human brain and mind. In his short writings of 1873-1877, James started to formulate his own middle path. His first steps on that path show that he did not reject either scientific or philosophic inquiry; instead, he viewed scientific knowledge as a way to understand philosophical questions more deeply. Saving his sharpest critiques for positivism, James endorsed scientific investigation without materialist assmptions. While his career in psychology was still only a hope, James treated science as a means toward humanist insight.
在1878年之前的5年里,当威廉·詹姆斯在心理学领域的事业逐渐确立时,他撰写了一系列笔记和评论,对这个新领域的许多先驱者的工作进行了评估。尽管私下里他仍不确定且在探索,但詹姆斯采用了一种公开且自信的口吻,批评了实证主义者和唯心主义者在人类大脑和心智研究方面的教条主义主张。在他1873年至1877年的短文里,詹姆斯开始阐述自己的中间道路。他在这条道路上迈出的第一步表明,他既不排斥科学探究,也不排斥哲学探究;相反,他将科学知识视为更深入理解哲学问题的一种方式。詹姆斯把最尖锐的批评留给了实证主义,他赞同在没有唯物主义假设的情况下进行科学研究。虽然他在心理学领域的事业当时还只是一个憧憬,但詹姆斯把科学当作获得人文主义洞察力的一种手段。