Scholz A
Institut für Geschichte der Medizin, Löscherstrasse.
Arch Hist Filoz Med. 1997;60(4):375-92.
Urban development, industrialisation, fluctuation of population and social impoverishment of increasing number of proletariat caused in XIX century spread of tuberculosis and venereal diseases. Despite clearance of their aetiology, therapeutic abilities were limited. Social and medical activity has brought to the new political and social way in fighting these diseases. In 1902 the politicians, social workers and physicians formed "German Society for Fighting against Venereal Diseases" (DGBD). Increase of incidence of venereal diseases in course and after I-World War brought on 11th December 1918 to publishing by the Government of Third Reich a decree on fighting venereal diseases. Among other the importance was attached to obligation of treatment, amenability to punishment of conscious spreading of infection, obligatory informing by physicians, creation of consultation stations. This regulatory was prepared in a situation of instant need and it included many compromise solutions, which made a radical improvement of a situation more difficult. Between 1918 and 1927 the work has been carried out on new legal solutions. A long time gone until the time of adopting new legal solutions could be explained with contradictory tendencies in various political trends. After rejection by the parliament in 1923 and 1925 of two drafts of act on fight against venereal diseases on 22nd June 1925, the next version of act was passed under debates of 10th Committee in succession. In this meeting took part the representatives of all parties represented in both houses of parliament (the Centre, German National Party, Social Democratic Party, Communist Party), and representatives of the Land Governments. Discussion at the Meeting of 10th Committee concerned the controversial standpoints on the following issues: obligation and points of compulsory treatment and bearing the financial costs of them, expansion of consultation stations, exclusive right of giving treatment by approved physicians. ...
19世纪,城市发展、工业化、人口流动以及无产阶级数量不断增加导致的社会贫困,使得结核病和性病蔓延。尽管病因已明,但治疗能力有限。社会和医疗活动为抗击这些疾病带来了新的政治和社会途径。1902年,政治家、社会工作者和医生成立了“德国性病防治协会”(DGBD)。一战期间及战后性病发病率上升,促使第三帝国政府于1918年12月11日发布了一项防治性病的法令。该法令尤其强调了治疗的义务、对故意传播感染行为的可惩罚性、医生的强制通报义务以及设立咨询站等内容。这项规定是在紧急需求的情况下制定的,其中包含许多折衷方案,这使得情况的根本改善变得更加困难。1918年至1927年间,人们一直在研究新的法律解决方案。采用新法律解决方案的时间拖得很长,这可以用各种政治趋势中的矛盾倾向来解释。1923年和1925年议会否决了两项防治性病法案草案后,1925年6月22日,法案的下一版本在第十委员会的相继辩论中获得通过。参加此次会议的有议会两院所有政党(中央党、德国国家党、社会民主党、共产党)的代表以及各邦政府的代表。第十委员会会议上的讨论涉及以下争议点:强制治疗的义务、地点以及费用承担,咨询站的扩充,经批准医生的独家治疗权……