Erichsen R
Ber Wiss. 1996;19(4):219-34. doi: 10.1002/bewi.19960190404.
After 1933 many scientists and university teachers were obliged to relinquish their posts in the universities of Germany because of national-socialist laws. Organizations-in-aid like the Academic Assistance Council in Great Britain tried to 'defend science and learning' raising funds and finding new openings for the expelled academics. But as immigration laws were tight and jobs were scarce in the host countries the AAC and the other organizations had to select the most qualified from among the applicants for support. -- The questions the article tries to answer are: What kind of criteria were applied in this selection? Who were the experts? How were the placements made? How did the applicants react to the decisions? Taking for example the AAC, it examines measures to assist a group of scientists who, having tried to settle down in England, finally emigrated to Turkey.
1933年以后，由于纳粹法律的缘故，许多科学家和大学教师被迫放弃他们在德国大学的职位。像英国学术援助委员会这样的援助组织试图“捍卫科学与学术”，为被驱逐的学者筹集资金并寻找新的出路。但由于移民法律严格，接收国的工作机会稀缺，学术援助委员会和其他组织不得不从申请者中挑选最有资格的人给予支持。——本文试图回答的问题是：在这种挑选过程中采用了什么样的标准？谁是专家？安置工作是如何进行的？申请者对这些决定有何反应？以学术援助委员会为例，它考察了为一群试图在英国定居但最终移民到土耳其的科学家提供援助的措施。
