Göckenjan G
Universität Bremen.
Dynamis. 1993;13:55-71.
This paper outlines the history of social disinterest on old people from the perspective of medical discourse since the end of the 18th century. The following thesis is proposed: since the Enlightenment medical discourse over illnesses associated with old age has been masked by the social valuation that dying is attributable to old age and old people could not make any great demands on medical assistance. Until the end of the 19th century it was theologians, not doctors, who were responsible for old people on the threshold to death. Around 1900 great interest arose in the problem complex "aging" and "rejuvenation" from the view point of bio-chemistry. But the associated cultural circumstances, namely a dominant social interest in youth and fitness, largely prevented an original medical interest in old people. This has only developed since the 1950s, not within the medical profession but in the "social" professions, primarily social work. From this perspective the application of Foucault's paradigm, in which old age, actually a social problem, is defined and addressed by medicine, in other words a "medicalization of old age", seems to be only conditionally meaningful as a conceptual framework for analysis.
本文从医学话语的角度概述了自18世纪末以来社会对老年人漠不关心的历史。提出了以下论点:自启蒙运动以来,与老年相关疾病的医学话语一直被一种社会观念所掩盖,即死亡归因于老年,老年人对医疗援助不能有过高要求。直到19世纪末,站在死亡门槛上的老年人是由神学家而非医生负责照料的。大约在1900年,从生物化学的角度,人们对“衰老”和“返老还童”这一问题复合体产生了极大兴趣。但相关的文化环境,即社会对年轻和健康的主导性关注,在很大程度上阻碍了医学对老年人的原发性兴趣。这种兴趣自20世纪50年代以来才开始发展,不过并非在医学专业内部,而是在“社会”专业,主要是社会工作领域。从这个角度来看,福柯范式的应用,即老年实际上是一个社会问题,却由医学来定义和处理,换句话说就是“老年的医学化”,作为一种分析概念框架似乎只是有条件地具有意义。