Suppr超能文献

[身着洁白无瑕制服的护士们:荷兰史学中的空白篇章?]

[Nurses in immaculate white: an empty page in Dutch historiography?].

作者信息

Wiegman N

机构信息

Medische Geschiedenis, Universiteit Amsterdam.

出版信息

Gewina. 1993;16(2):63-79.

Abstract

Until recently, the historiography of nursing in England and the Netherlands was written from a traditional, 'Whig-history' perspective. While focussing on famous leaders and examples such as Florence Nightingale in England and Jeltje de Bosch Kemper in the Netherlands, it told historical events in a chronological, narrative manner. The publication of a collection of essays by Celia Davies, entitled Rewriting nursing history (1980), which used new sources, theories and methods from the social sciences, while advocating a comparative approach, produced a revolution in the writing of nursing history in the Anglo-American world. This revolution resulted in a steady flow of publications on all aspects of the history of nursing. When compared to these Anglo-American developments, the Dutch writing of nursing history still lags behind. Although in the 1980s both medical history and womans history provided stimuli for a new orientation, a real break-through has not yet occurred. Central to an explanation of the backlog of Dutch historiography in this respect, is, it would seem, the rather late official recognition of nursing as an academic discipline, which only occurred in 1980.

摘要

直到最近,英国和荷兰护理史的编纂都是从传统的“辉格史观”角度进行的。在关注诸如英国的弗洛伦斯·南丁格尔和荷兰的耶尔捷·德·博施·肯珀等著名领袖和事例时,它以编年叙事的方式讲述历史事件。西莉亚·戴维斯所著的《改写护理史》(1980年)一书出版,该书运用了社会科学的新资料、理论和方法,同时倡导一种比较研究方法,在英美的护理史写作领域引发了一场革命。这场革命带来了关于护理史各个方面的源源不断的出版物。与这些英美的发展情况相比,荷兰护理史的写作仍滞后。尽管在20世纪80年代医学史和妇女史都为新的发展方向提供了推动力,但尚未出现真正的突破。在这方面,荷兰史学编纂滞后的一个关键原因似乎是,护理作为一门学科很晚才得到官方认可,这一情况直到1980年才出现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验