de Mijolla A
Rev Int Hist Psychanal. 1993;6:81-108.
Freud has a dual attitude to the biographical genre. When he places himself in the position of psychoanalyst-biographer of others, he is enthusiastic, speaking of ground to be conquered for psychoanalysis, and his works, as well as his correspondence, show that he continued to devote himself to investigations which resulted in interpretations of a number of personalities, the most detailed of which dealt with Leonardo de Vinci, Goethe, Dostoyevsky, President Wilson, and Moses. On the other hand, even though during the first years of the discovery of psychoanalysis he allowed himself, in a more or less veiled manner, confidences of an autobiographical nature, Freud remained very secretive about himself. He limited himself to making public only the routine information found on his university resume or the details of his life directly related to the discovery and the development of psychoanalysis. Hidden behind die Sache, the Cause, the man always vigorously defended himself against those who, braving the periodical destruction to which he subjected his archives, claimed to apply to him this "investigative drive" whose heuristic richness he otherwise celebrated. It is by means of fantasies of identification to the work, present in every biographical attempt, that we attempt to address here the contradictions of this dual attitude.
弗洛伊德对传记体裁持双重态度。当他将自己置于他人的精神分析传记作者的位置时,他充满热情,谈及精神分析有待征服的领域,他的著作以及书信表明,他持续投身于相关研究,这些研究成果是对诸多人物的解读,其中最为详尽的是关于列奥纳多·达·芬奇、歌德、陀思妥耶夫斯基、威尔逊总统和摩西的。另一方面,尽管在精神分析发现的最初几年,他或多或少以隐晦的方式透露了一些自传性质的秘密,但弗洛伊德对自己始终守口如瓶。他只公开了大学简历上的常规信息,以及与精神分析的发现和发展直接相关的生活细节。隐藏在“事情”、“事业”背后,他总是极力捍卫自己,反对那些不顾他定期销毁档案的行为,声称要将他所颂扬的具有启发意义的丰富性的“探究冲动”应用于他的人。正是通过在每一次传记尝试中都存在的对作品的认同幻想,我们试图在此探讨这种双重态度中的矛盾之处。