Suppr超能文献

[夏科是如何获得他的教授职位的]。

[How Charcot got his chair].

作者信息

Gelfand T

机构信息

Université d'Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Hist Sci Med. 1994;28(4):307-12.

Abstract

Charcot's career, as is well-known, reached a summit with his acquisition of the Faculty clinical chair of diseases of the nervous system inaugurated in 1882. Based upon previously untapped archival materials at the Charcot Library and the National Archives, this paper explores four questions: I. Was "Charcot's chair" really the first specialized chair for neurology?; 2. Was it founded specifically for Charcot?; 3. What role did the Faculty of Medicine play and did it offer any opposition?; 4. How important was the creation of the chair for the flourishing of the Salpêtrière school. Evidence is presented to show that Charcot considered a specialized chair in nervous diseases a high priority for his career and his school. Sometime around 1880, convinced of the importance of this project, he began to assemble arguments in its behalf from French and foreign sources, particularly from his German colleagues, Westphal and Erb. He learned that there were no precedents, not even in Berlin. Charcot's carefully prepared manuscript memoir presented a strong case for the "necessity" of the chair based on the recent progress and theoretical as well as practical importance of his subject. He described psychiatry, which already had a Faculty clinical chair, as but a "small part" of neuropathology and rejected the idea of combining the two disciplines. Although the project encountered opposition from several Faculty colleagues, who claimed that it was a personal favor for Charcot, powerful support from political allies such as Gambetta and Ferry ensured government funding. In fact, government action in behalf of the creation of the chair for Charcot preceded and surprised the medical Faculty. This paper shows the extent to which Charcot's own initiatives and arguments set the agenda and defined the role he envisaged for the new foundation at the center of the clinical research and teaching centre emerging under his direction at the Salpêtrière.

摘要

众所周知,夏科的职业生涯在1882年他获得医学院神经系统疾病临床教授职位时达到了顶峰。基于夏科图书馆和国家档案馆中此前未被利用的档案材料,本文探讨了四个问题:一、“夏科的职位”真的是首个神经学专业职位吗?二、它是专门为夏科设立的吗?三、医学院扮演了什么角色,它有提出反对意见吗?四、该职位的设立对萨尔佩特里埃学派的蓬勃发展有多重要?文中给出的证据表明,夏科认为设立一个神经疾病专业职位对他的职业生涯和他的学派来说是重中之重。1880年左右的某个时候,他深信这个项目的重要性,开始从法国和国外的资料来源,特别是他的德国同事韦斯特法尔和埃尔布那里收集支持该项目的论据。他了解到此前没有先例,甚至在柏林也没有。夏科精心准备的手稿回忆录基于他所研究主题的最新进展以及理论和实践重要性,有力地论证了设立该职位的“必要性”。他将当时已经设有医学院临床教授职位的精神病学描述为神经病理学的“一小部分”,并拒绝了将这两个学科合并的想法。尽管该项目遭到了几位医学院同事的反对,他们声称这是对夏科的个人偏袒,但甘必大、费里等政治盟友的大力支持确保了政府提供资金。事实上,政府为夏科设立该职位所采取的行动先于医学院并令其感到意外。本文展示了夏科自身的倡议和论点在多大程度上设定了议程,并界定了他为这个新机构所设想的角色,该机构将处于他在萨尔佩特里埃指导下正在形成的临床研究和教学中心的核心位置。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验