Denton I C
J Healthc Inf Manag. 2001 Fall;15(3):251-9.
The Department of Health and Human Services identifies the electronic personal health record (EPHR) as a fundamental "dimension" of a future national health information infrastructure. Currently thirty-some EPHRs are available on the market. Though the potential advantages for clinical care, patient education, and administrative streamlining are highly touted, they remain speculative, and the core question remains: Will consumers actually use EPHRs? Upon retirement in July 1999, the author provided 330 patients a commercial EPHR containing clinical office records from the practice's EMR. One year later, he conducted a mail-in survey that posed a series of relevant yes-and-no questions regarding usage and invited narrative comment and anonymous responses. This article tabulates the results and synopsizes patients' opinions. It provides considerable enlightenment regarding patients, who, among other responses, intended to begin or continue keeping records, used the EPHR on medical visits, would rather not store health information on the Internet, wished to use e-mail with the doctor's office, believed doctors do not keep full records, and strongly believed individuals should keep their own records.
美国卫生与公众服务部将电子个人健康记录(EPHR)视为未来国家卫生信息基础设施的一个基本“维度”。目前市场上有三十多种电子个人健康记录。尽管临床护理、患者教育和行政流程简化方面的潜在优势备受吹捧,但这些优势仍具有不确定性,核心问题依然存在:消费者真的会使用电子个人健康记录吗?1999年7月退休后,作者为330名患者提供了一份商业电子个人健康记录,其中包含该诊所电子病历系统中的临床门诊记录。一年后,他进行了一次邮寄调查,提出了一系列关于使用情况的是/否相关问题,并邀请患者进行叙述性评论和匿名回复。本文列出了调查结果并总结了患者的意见。它为患者提供了相当多的启示,在其他回复中,患者打算开始或继续保存记录、在就诊时使用电子个人健康记录、不愿在互联网上存储健康信息、希望与医生办公室使用电子邮件、认为医生没有完整记录,并且坚信个人应该保存自己的记录。