Kaelber David C, Jha Ashish K, Johnston Douglas, Middleton Blackford, Bates David W
Partners HealthCare Information Systems, Boston MA, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 Nov-Dec;15(6):729-36. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2547. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
Patients, policymakers, providers, payers, employers, and others have increasing interest in using personal health records (PHRs) to improve healthcare costs, quality, and efficiency. While organizations now invest millions of dollars in PHRs, the best PHR architectures, value propositions, and descriptions are not universally agreed upon. Despite widespread interest and activity, little PHR research has been done to date, and targeted research investment in PHRs appears inadequate. The authors reviewed the existing PHR specific literature (100 articles) and divided the articles into seven categories, of which four in particular--evaluation of PHR functions, adoption and attitudes of healthcare providers and patients towards PHRs, PHR related privacy and security, and PHR architecture--present important research opportunities. We also briefly discuss other research related to PHRs, PHR research funding sources, and PHR business models. We believe that additional PHR research can increase the likelihood that future PHR system deployments will beneficially impact healthcare costs, quality, and efficiency.
患者、政策制定者、医疗服务提供者、支付方、雇主及其他各方对于使用个人健康记录(PHR)来降低医疗成本、提高医疗质量和效率的兴趣日益浓厚。尽管各机构目前已在个人健康记录方面投入了数百万美元,但对于最佳的个人健康记录架构、价值主张及描述并未达成普遍共识。尽管受到广泛关注且有诸多相关活动,但迄今为止针对个人健康记录的研究甚少,而且对个人健康记录的针对性研究投资似乎也不足。作者回顾了现有的个人健康记录相关文献(100篇文章),并将这些文章分为七类,其中四类——个人健康记录功能评估、医疗服务提供者及患者对个人健康记录的采用情况和态度、个人健康记录相关的隐私与安全以及个人健康记录架构——呈现出重要的研究机会。我们还简要讨论了与个人健康记录相关的其他研究、个人健康记录研究资金来源及个人健康记录商业模式。我们认为,更多的个人健康记录研究能够增加未来个人健康记录系统部署对医疗成本、质量和效率产生有益影响的可能性。