In the trenches, doubts about scientific integrity.

Suppr

超能文献

作者信息

Hamilton David P

出版信息

Science. 1992 Mar 27;255(5052):1636. doi: 10.1126/science.11642983.

DOI:10.1126/science.11642983

PMID:11642983

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

In the trenches, doubts about scientific integrity.

Science. 1992 Mar 27;255(5052):1636. doi: 10.1126/science.11642983.

Fraud will out--or will it?

New Sci. 1987 Aug 6;115(1572):62-3.

Misconduct in research: an issue of science policy and practice.

Minerva. 1985 Summer;23(2):175-202. doi: 10.1007/BF01099941.

Misconduct in science is not rare, a survey finds.

N Y Times Web. 1993 Nov 12:A22.

Her study shattered the myth that fraud in science is a rarity.

N Y Times Web. 1993 Nov 23:C3.

Perceptions concerning research integrity and the practice of data audit in the biotechnology industry.

Account Res. 1993;3(2-3):187-95. doi: 10.1080/08989629308573849.

The scientific community perspective on research integrity.

Account Res. 1993;3(2-3):117-22. doi: 10.1080/08989629308573839.

Ethical challenges to risk scientists: an exploratory analysis of survey data.

Sci Technol Human Values. 1994 Spring;19(2):223-41. doi: 10.1177/016224399401900206.

Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.

J Pharm Law. 1993;2(1):15-34.

Institutional policies for responding to allegations of research fraud.

IRB. 1986 Jul-Aug;8(4):1-7.

引用本文的文献

Research misconduct and data fraud in clinical trials: prevalence and causal factors.

Int J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb;21(1):15-21. doi: 10.1007/s10147-015-0887-3. Epub 2015 Aug 20.

Data fraud in clinical trials.

Clin Investig (Lond). 2015;5(2):161-173. doi: 10.4155/cli.14.116.

Measuring consensus about scientific research norms.

Sci Eng Ethics. 2000 Jul;6(3):315-40. doi: 10.1007/s11948-000-0035-x.

Lessons from the Pearce affair: handling scientific fraud.

BMJ. 1995 Jun 17;310(6994):1547-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6994.1547.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

相似文献

In the trenches, doubts about scientific integrity.

Science. 1992 Mar 27;255(5052):1636. doi: 10.1126/science.11642983.

Fraud will out--or will it?

New Sci. 1987 Aug 6;115(1572):62-3.

Misconduct in research: an issue of science policy and practice.

Minerva. 1985 Summer;23(2):175-202. doi: 10.1007/BF01099941.

Misconduct in science is not rare, a survey finds.

N Y Times Web. 1993 Nov 12:A22.

Her study shattered the myth that fraud in science is a rarity.

N Y Times Web. 1993 Nov 23:C3.

Perceptions concerning research integrity and the practice of data audit in the biotechnology industry.

Account Res. 1993;3(2-3):187-95. doi: 10.1080/08989629308573849.

The scientific community perspective on research integrity.

Account Res. 1993;3(2-3):117-22. doi: 10.1080/08989629308573839.

Ethical challenges to risk scientists: an exploratory analysis of survey data.

Sci Technol Human Values. 1994 Spring;19(2):223-41. doi: 10.1177/016224399401900206.

Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.

J Pharm Law. 1993;2(1):15-34.

Institutional policies for responding to allegations of research fraud.

IRB. 1986 Jul-Aug;8(4):1-7.

引用本文的文献

Research misconduct and data fraud in clinical trials: prevalence and causal factors.

Int J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb;21(1):15-21. doi: 10.1007/s10147-015-0887-3. Epub 2015 Aug 20.

Data fraud in clinical trials.

Clin Investig (Lond). 2015;5(2):161-173. doi: 10.4155/cli.14.116.

Measuring consensus about scientific research norms.

Sci Eng Ethics. 2000 Jul;6(3):315-40. doi: 10.1007/s11948-000-0035-x.

Lessons from the Pearce affair: handling scientific fraud.

BMJ. 1995 Jun 17;310(6994):1547-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6994.1547.