Lessons from the Pearce affair: handling scientific fraud.
作者信息
Lock S
出版信息
BMJ. 1995 Jun 17;310(6994):1547-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6994.1547.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Lessons from the Pearce affair: handling scientific fraud.皮尔斯事件的教训：处理科学欺诈行为
BMJ. 1995 Jun 17;310(6994):1547-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6994.1547.
2
UK royal college responds to scientific fraud.
Lancet. 1995 Jun 17;345(8964):1566. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)91108-1.
3
Fraud in medicine. Coping with fraud.医学领域的欺诈行为。应对欺诈。
Lancet. 1998;352 Suppl 4:SIV11.
4
Time to face up to research misconduct.是时候直面科研不端行为了。
BMJ. 1996 Mar 30;312(7034):789-90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7034.789.
5
Obstetrician suspended after research inquiry.产科医生在研究调查后被停职。
BMJ. 1994 Dec 3;309(6967):1459. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6967.1459.
6
Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. Deception: difficulties and initiatives.
BMJ. 1998 Jun 6;316(7146):1731-2.
7
Consultant struck off for fraudulent claims.
BMJ. 1995 Jun 17;310(6994):1554-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6994.1554a.
8
British cast spotlight on misconduct in scientific research.英国聚焦科研不当行为。
N Y Times Web. 1998 Jun 9:F3.
9
Different lessons from the Darsee affair?
Int J Cardiol. 1984;5(11):9-11.
10
Redundant publication in biomedical sciences: scientific misconduct or necessity?生物医学领域的重复发表：科学不端行为还是必要之举？
Sci Eng Ethics. 1998 Apr;4(2):135-40. doi: 10.1007/s11948-998-0043-9.
引用本文的文献
1
Criminals in the Citadel and Deceit all along the Watchtower: Irresponsibility, Fraud, and Complicity in the Search for Scientific Truth.城堡中的罪犯与瞭望塔全程的欺骗：探寻科学真理过程中的不负责任、欺诈与同谋。
Mens Sana Monogr. 2012 Jan;10(1):158-80. doi: 10.4103/0973-1229.91426.
2
Medical professionalism meets generation X: a perfect storm?医学专业精神与X一代：一场完美风暴？
Tex Heart Inst J. 2011;38(5):465-70; discussion 470.
3
Research misconduct: the poisoning of the well.研究不端行为：恶意中伤。
J R Soc Med. 2006 May;99(5):232-7. doi: 10.1177/014107680609900514.
4
Authors and publication practices.作者与出版惯例。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2006 Jan;12(1):41-52. doi: 10.1007/pl00022267.
5
Authorship: an ethical dilemma of science.作者身份：科学领域的一个伦理困境。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2005 Sep 1;123(5):242-6. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802005000500008. Epub 2005 Dec 8.
6
Editorial misconduct.编辑不当行为。
BMJ. 2003 Jun 7;326(7401):1224-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7401.1224.
7
The misconduct of redundant publication.重复发表行为不当。
Ann Rheum Dis. 1996 Nov;55(11):783-5. doi: 10.1136/ard.55.11.783.
8
Medical investigators' views about ethics and fraud in medical research.医学研究人员对医学研究中的伦理与欺诈行为的看法。
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1995 Sep-Oct;29(5):405-9.
9
Time to face up to research misconduct.是时候直面科研不端行为了。
BMJ. 1996 Mar 30;312(7034):789-90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7034.789.
10
Scientific and letter fraud in the Victorian era.维多利亚时代的科学与信件造假。
BMJ. 1995 Dec 16;311(7020):1644. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7020.1644.
本文引用的文献
1
In the trenches, doubts about scientific integrity.在战壕中，对科学诚信的质疑。
Science. 1992 Mar 27;255(5052):1636. doi: 10.1126/science.11642983.
2
Shattuck Lecture--misconduct in medical research.
N Engl J Med. 1993 Jun 3;328(22):1610-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199306033282207.
3
No need for a dry run.无需进行预演。
Lancet. 1994 Jul 2;344(8914):1-2.
4
Consultant struck off for fraudulent claims.
BMJ. 1995 Jun 17;310(6994):1554-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6994.1554a.
5
Misconduct in medical research.
Lancet. 1995 May 6;345(8958):1161-2. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90984-2.
6
Lessons from the Darsee affair.达西事件的教训。
N Engl J Med. 1983 Jun 9;308(23):1415-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198306093082311.
7
The Harvard fraud case: where does the problem lie?哈佛欺诈案：问题出在哪里？
JAMA. 1983 Apr 8;249(14):1797-99, 1802-7.
8
Misconduct in medical research: does it exist in Britain?医学研究中的不当行为：在英国存在吗？
BMJ. 1988 Dec 10;297(6662):1531-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6662.1531.
9
Editors and auditors.
JAMA. 1989 May 5;261(17):2543-5.
10
Correcting the literature following fraudulent publication.纠正欺诈性发表后的文献。
JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1416-9.
Zotero 插件