Campbell Courtney S
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1994 Spring;3(2):303-6. doi: 10.1017/s0963180100005065.
As a teacher of biomedical ethics, I have constantly sought a method to motivate my students to engage in meaningful moral debate on the controversial issues of abortion and euthanasia, without risking a shouting match (as happened on one occasion). The moral views are so personalized and polarized that silence often displaces discourse. Ronald Dworkin's masterful Life's Dominion offers an innovative and insightful way through this impasse by identifying moral commitments shared by persons with different conclusions. His argument begins with "conservative" premises and winds up with "liberal" conclusions. It is a philosophical and constitutional analysis of the meaning of life and death that draws on substantive religious values. In so doing, Dworkin suggests an approach that could alter the adversarial and even violent nature of our cultural debate about the ending of life towards a more dialogic and tolerant, but not indifferent, mode....
作为一名生物医学伦理学教师,我一直在寻找一种方法,能激励我的学生就堕胎和安乐死这些有争议的问题展开有意义的道德辩论,而不至于陷入一场激烈的争吵(有一次就发生了这种情况)。道德观点如此个性化且两极分化,以至于沉默常常取代了对话。罗纳德·德沃金的杰作《生命的主权》提供了一种创新且深刻的方式来打破这一僵局,即通过识别不同结论的人所共有的道德承诺。他的论证从“保守”的前提开始,最终得出“自由”的结论。这是对生与死的意义进行的哲学和宪法分析,借鉴了实质性的宗教价值观。通过这样做,德沃金提出了一种方法,这种方法可以改变我们关于生命终结的文化辩论中那种对抗性甚至暴力的性质,使其朝着一种更具对话性和宽容性,但并非冷漠的模式转变……