Reich Warren Thomas
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1995 Mar;5(1):19-34. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0143.
An article by Warren Reich in the December 1994 issue of this journal concludes that the word "bioethics" and the field of study it names experienced a "bilocated birth" in 1970/1971 under Van Rensselaer Potter, at the University of Wisconsin, and André Hellegers, at Georgetown University. Further historical inquiry confirms (1) that there were, from the start, some major differences -- even clashes -- between the Potter and the Hellegers/Georgetown understandings of bioethics; and (2) that the Hellegers/Georgetown approach came to be the more widely accepted meaning of the term, while Potter's idea of bioethics remained largely marginalized. However, this inquiry also results in a third, unanticipated, conclusion: that Hellegers (in contrast to the dominant model offered by the Georgetown scholars) actually proposed a global approach to bioethics, bringing his vision much closer to Potter's evolving view than previously has been acknowledged.
沃伦·赖希在1994年12月期的本期刊上发表的一篇文章得出结论称,“生物伦理学”一词及其所命名的研究领域于1970年/1971年在威斯康星大学的范·伦斯勒·波特和乔治敦大学的安德烈·赫勒格斯的推动下经历了“两地诞生”。进一步的历史探究证实:(1)从一开始,波特对生物伦理学的理解与赫勒格斯/乔治敦大学的理解之间就存在一些重大差异——甚至冲突;(2)赫勒格斯/乔治敦大学的方法逐渐成为该术语更被广泛接受的含义,而波特的生物伦理学理念在很大程度上仍处于边缘地位。然而,这项探究还得出了第三个意外的结论:与乔治敦大学学者提出的主导模式不同,赫勒格斯实际上提出了一种全球生物伦理学方法,他的愿景比之前所认识到的更接近波特不断演变的观点。