• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

马卡西达伊斯兰教法作为传统生物伦理学的补充框架:在马来西亚辅助生殖技术 (ART) 法特瓦中的应用。

Maqasid al-Shariah as a Complementary Framework for Conventional Bioethics: Application in Malaysian Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Fatwa.

机构信息

Programme of Applied Science with Islamic Studies, Academy of Islamic Studies, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Department of Fiqh and Usul, Academy of Islamic Studies, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Oct;24(5):1493-1502. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9963-6. Epub 2017 Sep 11.

DOI:10.1007/s11948-017-9963-6
PMID:28895055
Abstract

Rapid development in the area of assisted reproductive technology (ART), has benefited mankind by addressing reproductive problems. However, the emergence of new technologies and techniques raises various issues and discussions among physicians and the masses, especially on issues related to bioethics. Apart from solutions provided using conventional bioethics framework, solutions can also be derived via a complementary framework of bioethics based on the Higher Objectives of the Divine Law (Maqasid al-Shariah) in tackling these problems. This approach in the Islamic World has been applied and localised in the Malaysian context. Thus, this paper highlights a conceptual theoretical framework for solving current bioethical issues, with a special focus on ART in the Malaysian context, and compares this theory with conventional theories of bioethics.

摘要

辅助生殖技术(ART)领域的快速发展通过解决生殖问题造福了人类。然而,新技术和技术的出现引起了医生和大众的各种问题和讨论,特别是与生物伦理有关的问题。除了使用传统的生物伦理学框架提供的解决方案外,还可以通过基于神法的更高目标(Maqasid al-Shariah)的生物伦理学补充框架来解决这些问题。这种方法在伊斯兰世界已经得到应用,并在马来西亚的背景下本地化。因此,本文重点介绍了一种解决当前生物伦理问题的概念理论框架,特别关注马来西亚的辅助生殖技术,并将该理论与传统的生物伦理学理论进行了比较。

相似文献

1
Maqasid al-Shariah as a Complementary Framework for Conventional Bioethics: Application in Malaysian Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Fatwa.马卡西达伊斯兰教法作为传统生物伦理学的补充框架:在马来西亚辅助生殖技术 (ART) 法特瓦中的应用。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Oct;24(5):1493-1502. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9963-6. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
2
Maqasid al-Shariah Based Islamic Bioethics: A Comprehensive Approach.马卡西达伊斯兰教法的伊斯兰生物伦理学:一种综合方法。
J Bioeth Inq. 2019 Sep;16(3):333-345. doi: 10.1007/s11673-019-09902-8. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
3
Maqasid al-shariah as a complementary framework to conventional bioethics.作为传统生物伦理学补充框架的伊斯兰教法宗旨
Sci Eng Ethics. 2014 Jun;20(2):317-27. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9457-0. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
4
Tri-parent Baby Technology and Preservation of Lineage: An Analysis from the Perspective of Maqasid al-Shari'ah Based Islamic Bioethics.三亲婴儿技术与家族脉络的保存:从伊斯兰教法目的论的角度进行分析。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Feb;25(1):129-142. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9980-5. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
5
Using the Maqāṣid al-Sharī'ah to Furnish an Islamic Bioethics: Conceptual and Practical Issues.用马格西迪沙里亚为伊斯兰生物伦理学提供依据:概念和实践问题。
J Bioeth Inq. 2019 Sep;16(3):347-352. doi: 10.1007/s11673-019-09940-2. Epub 2019 Oct 2.
6
Islam, Assisted Reproduction, and the Bioethical Aftermath.伊斯兰教、辅助生殖技术及生物伦理后果。
J Relig Health. 2016 Apr;55(2):422-30. doi: 10.1007/s10943-015-0151-1.
7
Beyond Halal: Maqasid al-Shari'ah to Assess Bioethical Issues Arising from Genetically Modified Crops.超越清真食品:伊斯兰教法的目的论评估转基因作物引发的生物伦理问题。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Jun;26(3):1463-1476. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00177-6. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
8
An Ethico-Legal Analysis of Artificial Womb Technology and Extracorporeal Gestation Based on Islamic Legal Maxims.基于伊斯兰法律格言的人工子宫技术和体外孕育的伦理法律分析。
New Bioeth. 2024 Mar;30(1):34-46. doi: 10.1080/20502877.2023.2269638. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
9
Enhancement technologies and the person: an Islamic view.增强技术与人类:伊斯兰视角
J Law Med Ethics. 2008 Spring;36(1):59-64, 3. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00237.x.
10
Does bioethics provide answers?: Secular and religious bioethics and our procreative future.生物伦理学能提供答案吗?:世俗与宗教生物伦理学以及我们的生殖未来。
Cumberland Law Rev. 2004;35(3):473-517.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical constraints and dilemmas in the provision of in-vitro fertilization treatment in Ghana: from the perspectives of experts.加纳体外受精治疗中存在的伦理约束和困境:专家观点。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Oct 17;25(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01113-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Live birth derived from oocyte spindle transfer to prevent mitochondrial disease.通过卵母细胞纺锤体转移实现活产以预防线粒体疾病。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2017 Apr;34(4):361-368. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.01.013.
2
Darurah (Necessity) and Its Application in Islamic Ethical Assessment of Medical Applications: A Review on Malaysian Fatwa.紧急情况(Darurah)及其在医学应用的伊斯兰伦理评估中的应用:关于马来西亚宗教法令的综述
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Oct;22(5):1319-1332. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9698-1. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
3
Western and Islamic bioethics: How close is the gap?
西方与伊斯兰生物伦理学:差距有多近?
Avicenna J Med. 2013 Jan;3(1):8-14. doi: 10.4103/2231-0770.112788.
4
Maqasid al-shariah as a complementary framework to conventional bioethics.作为传统生物伦理学补充框架的伊斯兰教法宗旨
Sci Eng Ethics. 2014 Jun;20(2):317-27. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9457-0. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
5
International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009.国际辅助生殖技术监测委员会(ICMART)与世界卫生组织(WHO)2009年修订的辅助生殖技术术语词汇表
Fertil Steril. 2009 Nov;92(5):1520-4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.009. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
6
Islamic perspectives in human reproduction.伊斯兰教对人类生殖的观点。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17 Suppl 3:34-8. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60328-8.
7
Religion and moral meaning in bioethics.生物伦理学中的宗教与道德意义。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1990 Jul-Aug;20(4):S4-10.
8
The word "bioethics": the struggle over its earliest meanings.“生物伦理学”一词:关于其最初含义的争论。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1995 Mar;5(1):19-34. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0143.
9
The word "bioethics": its birth and the legacies of those who shaped it.“生物伦理学”一词:它的诞生以及塑造它的那些人的遗产。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1994 Dec;4(4):319-35. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0126.