Tong Rosemarie
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1996 Mar;6(1):37-52. doi: 10.1353/ken.1996.0004.
Although a wide variety of feminist approaches to bioethics presently share a common feminist methodology (sometimes referred to as "raising the woman question"), they do not all share the same feminist politics, ontology, epistemology, and ethics. As a result of their philosophical differences, feminist bioethicists do not always agree on which biomedical principles, practices, and policies are best suited to serving women's interests. In other words, some feminist bioethicists insist that so-called "assisted reproduction" enhances women's procreative liberty, while others claim that it does nothing of the sort. Although such disagreement among feminist bioethicists reassures the general public that the feminist "program" for bioethics is not ideologically monolithic, it also confuses the public, especially women. In order to overcome this confusion, feminist bioethicists should work toward developing the kind of shared theoretical base that will foster frequent consensus on the biomedical principles, practices, and policies most likely to serve the interests of most women in the U.S. today.
尽管目前各种各样的女性主义生物伦理学方法都采用了一种共同的女性主义方法论(有时被称为“提出女性问题”),但它们并非都具有相同的女性主义政治、本体论、认识论和伦理学。由于它们在哲学上存在差异,女性主义生物伦理学家对于哪些生物医学原则、实践和政策最适合服务于女性利益并不总是意见一致。换句话说,一些女性主义生物伦理学家坚持认为所谓的“辅助生殖”增强了女性的生育自由,而另一些人则声称事实并非如此。尽管女性主义生物伦理学家之间的这种分歧让公众放心,即女性主义的生物伦理学“纲领”在意识形态上并非铁板一块,但这也让公众,尤其是女性感到困惑。为了克服这种困惑,女性主义生物伦理学家应该努力发展那种能够促进就最有可能服务于当今美国大多数女性利益的生物医学原则、实践和政策达成频繁共识的共享理论基础。