Why engineered organisms are safe.
作者信息
Brill Winston J
出版信息
Issues Sci Technol. 1988 Spring;4(3):44-50.
PMID:11645609
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Why engineered organisms are safe.为何工程生物是安全的。
Issues Sci Technol. 1988 Spring;4(3):44-50.
2
Regulating the environmental release of genetically engineered organisms: Foundation on Economic Trends v. Heckler.规范基因工程生物的环境释放：经济趋势基金会诉赫克勒案
Fla State Univ Law Rev. 1985 Winter;12(4):891-921.
3
Ice-minus bacteria: further snag and further delay.减冰细菌：更多阻碍与进一步延迟。
Nature. 1986 Mar 6;320(6057):2. doi: 10.1038/320002b0.
4
Regulating genetic engineering in an era of increased judicial deference: a proper balance of the federal powers.在司法尊重增加的时代规范基因工程：联邦权力的恰当平衡
Adm Law Rev. 1988 Summer;40(3):303-44.
5
The challenge of biotechnology.生物技术的挑战。
Yale Law Policy Rev. 1985 Spring;3(2):336-57.
6
Scientific uncertainty in regulating deliberate release of genetically engineered organisms: substantive judicial review and institutional alternatives.监管转基因生物蓄意释放中的科学不确定性：实质性司法审查与制度选择
HELR Harvard Environ Law Rev. 1987 Winter;11(1):203-46.
7
Regulating biotechnology.规范生物技术。
Issues Sci Technol. 1985 Spring;1(3):40-56.
8
Another wrinkle in patchwork of US environmental release.美国环境排放拼凑局面中的另一个棘手问题。
Nature. 1988 Jan 14;331(6152):107. doi: 10.1038/331107a0.
9
Biotechnology: can a new technology survive?生物技术：一项新技术能否存续？
St Louis Univ Law J. 1987;31(3):673-97.
10
Congress ponders rDNA and environmental risks.国会审议重组DNA与环境风险。
Science. 1983 Jul 8;221(4606):136-7.
引用本文的文献
1
The true meaning of 'exotic species' as a model for genetically engineered organisms.“外来物种”作为基因工程生物模型的真正意义。
Experientia. 1993 Mar 15;49(3):225-34. doi: 10.1007/BF01923530.
Zotero 插件