Case presentation 1 (1991): A newborn with holoprosencephaly -- responses by the Rogue Valley (Medford, Or.) Medical Center's Pediatric/Perinatal Ethics Subcommittee, the Providence (Oakland, Calif.) Hospital's HEC, and the patient's hospital's HEC.
出版信息
HEC Forum. 1991;3(1):51-8.
PMID:11645688
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
2
Infant care review committees: their moral responsibilities.
Linacre Q. 1985 Nov;52(4):361-74.
3
4
Treatment dilemmas for imperiled newborns: why quality of life counts.濒危新生儿的治疗困境：为何生活质量至关重要。
South Calif Law Rev. 1985 Sep;58(6):1283-347.
5
The care of defective neonates, ethics committees and federal intervention.
Linacre Q. 1984 Aug;51(3):255-76.
6
Withholding treatment from defective newborns: who decides and on what criteria?不给有缺陷的新生儿进行治疗：由谁来决定以及依据什么标准？
Univ Kans Law Rev. 1983 Spring;31(3):377-407.
7
Nat Hentoff on the babies Doe.纳特·亨托夫谈“婴儿多伊”事件。
Hum Life Rev. 1984 Spring;10(2):73-104.
8
Bedside story.床边故事。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1992 Winter;1(1):85-6.
9
The legacy of Baby Doe: five perspectives.
Psychol Today. 1987 Jan;21(1):70-71, 74-75.
10
A critique of Louisiana's approach to withholding medical treatment from defective newborns.
South Univ Law Rev. 1983 Spring;9(2):157-84.
Zotero 插件