Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
In re Baby K.
Fed Suppl. 1993 Jul 1;832:1022-31.
2
When a patient demands what health care providers deem foolish: medical-ethical analysis of the case of Baby K.
Clin Ethics Rep. 1993;7(4):1-12.
3
In re Baby K.
Fed Report. 1994 Feb 10;16:590-9.
4
Child abuse by whom? -- Parental rights and judicial competency determinations: the Baby K and Baby Terry cases.
Ohio North Univ Law Rev. 1994;20(4):821-46.
5
A legal challenge to the refusal to provide inappropriate treatment: the case of Baby K.
Clin Ethics Rep. 1994 Spring;8(1):1-8.
6
Hospital appeals decision ordering treatment for baby missing a brain.
N Y Times Web. 1993 Sep 24:A10.
7
Commentary: what is really at stake in Baby K? A response to Ellen Flannery.
J Law Med Ethics. 1995 Spring;23(1):13-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1995.tb01324.x.
8
Anencephalic baby's right to life.
Lancet. 1993 Oct 9;342(8876):919. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91956-m.
9
Baby K: protected at law.
Trends Health Care Law Ethics. 1994 Winter;9(1):7-12.
10
Court order to treat baby with partial brain prompts debate on costs and ethics.
N Y Times Web. 1994 Feb 20:20.
引用本文的文献
1
The pressure to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining therapy from critically ill patients in the United States.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Jun 1;175(11):1104-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200609-1397CP. Epub 2007 Mar 22.
Zotero 插件