Child abuse by whom? -- Parental rights and judicial competency determinations: the Baby K and Baby Terry cases.
作者信息
Bopp James, Coleson Richard E
出版信息
Ohio North Univ Law Rev. 1994;20(4):821-46.
PMID:11652997
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Child abuse by whom? -- Parental rights and judicial competency determinations: the Baby K and Baby Terry cases.
Ohio North Univ Law Rev. 1994;20(4):821-46.
2
A legal challenge to the refusal to provide inappropriate treatment: the case of Baby K.
Clin Ethics Rep. 1994 Spring;8(1):1-8.
3
In re Baby K.
Fed Suppl. 1993 Jul 1;832:1022-31.
4
Killing "the handicapped" -- before and after birth.
Harv Womens Law J. 1993 Spring;16:79-138.
5
Commentary: what is really at stake in Baby K? A response to Ellen Flannery.
J Law Med Ethics. 1995 Spring;23(1):13-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1995.tb01324.x.
6
Medical futility: a futile concept?
Wash Lee Law Rev. 1996;53(2):803-48.
7
When a patient demands what health care providers deem foolish: medical-ethical analysis of the case of Baby K.
Clin Ethics Rep. 1993;7(4):1-12.
8
Delivery room resuscitation of the high-risk infant: a conflict of rights.
Cathol Lawyer. 1990;33(4):325-60.
9
Hospital appeals decision ordering treatment for baby missing a brain.
N Y Times Web. 1993 Sep 24:A10.
10
Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn.
Linacre Q. 1985 Feb;52(1):45-76.
引用本文的文献
1
Licensing Surrogate Decision-Makers.
HEC Forum. 2017 Jun;29(2):145-169. doi: 10.1007/s10730-016-9316-x.
Zotero 插件