强奸研究的逻辑、伦理与修辞：对莫舍和邦德的回应

Logic, ethics, and rhetoric of research on rape: a reply to Mosher and Bond.

作者信息

Korn James H, Huelsman Timothy J, Reed Cynthia K

出版信息

Ethics Behav. 1992;2(2):123-8. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0202_5.

Abstract

Mosher and Bond (this issue) suggest experimental designs that are not appropriate for the research purposes they criticize. In defending their own research, they make contradictory statements about the realism of their guided imagery procedure for simulating rape. They present data that we believe provide evidence for the possibility that wrongful harm occurred in their previous research. We assert our right to study the ethics of research and object to specious charges of having threatened sexual freedom and being associated with ideologues of the right and left.

摘要

莫舍和邦德（本期）提出的实验设计并不适用于他们所批评的研究目的。在为他们自己的研究辩护时，他们就模拟强奸的引导式意象程序的真实性做出了相互矛盾的陈述。他们提供的数据，我们认为能为他们之前的研究中可能发生不当伤害的可能性提供证据。我们主张我们研究研究伦理的权利，并反对关于威胁性自由以及与左右翼意识形态者有关联的不实指控。