Anstötz Christoph
Bioethics. 1993 Jul;7(4):340-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1993.tb00224.x.
In October 1992 a young woman died in a car accident. She was pregnant and her fetus appeared to be unhurt, so a decision had to be made: should the mother's body be artificially supported in order to give the fetus a chance to live? The situation became a public question that split the nation in two. One side demanded -- that the young woman -- and her child -- be left to die in dignity. The other side referred to the unborn child's right to live and therefore wanted the body of the woman maintained until the fetus could be born. The following report consists of four parts. The first describes the case. In the second part the decision and its official justification are presented. The third part offers an impression of the unusual emotional reactions to which the case of the "Erlanger Baby" has given rise. The final part is a discussion of the issue and some comments.
1992年10月,一名年轻女子死于一场车祸。她当时怀有身孕,其胎儿似乎未受伤害,因此必须做出一个决定:是否应该人工维持母亲的身体,以便给胎儿一个存活的机会?这一情况成为了一个公众问题,使全国分成了两派。一方要求让这位年轻女子和她的孩子尊严地死去。另一方则提及未出生胎儿的生存权,因此希望维持女子的身体,直到胎儿能够出生。以下报告由四个部分组成。第一部分描述了该案例。第二部分呈现了该决定及其官方理由。第三部分展现了“埃尔朗根婴儿”案例引发的不同寻常的情绪反应。最后一部分是对该问题的讨论及一些评论。