• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Who are the beneficiaries?

作者信息

Tännsjö Torbjörn

出版信息

Bioethics. 1992 Oct;6(4):288-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1992.tb00207.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1992.tb00207.x
PMID:11652091
Abstract

Is it defensible that society spends money on medical or research projects intended to help people solve their fertility problems? Suppose that we want to answer this question from the point of view of a utilitarian cost-benefit analysis. The answer to the question then depends, of course, on how expensive these projects turn out to be, relative to the costs of other possible projects. But it depends also on how we assess the benefits of these projects. To whom do they accrue? Who are the beneficiaries of these projects?

摘要

相似文献

1
Who are the beneficiaries?
Bioethics. 1992 Oct;6(4):288-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1992.tb00207.x.
2
In defense of wrongful life: bringing political theory to the defense of a tort.为错误生命权辩护：运用政治理论为一项侵权行为辩护。
Fordham Law Rev. 1994 Apr;62(6):1675-704.
3
The sanctity of life, the quality of life and the new 'Baby Doe' law.生命的神圣性、生活质量与新的“宝贝多伊”法案。
Linacre Q. 1985 Aug;52(3):258-70.
4
Possible people.可能的人选。
Bioethics. 1988 Oct;2(4):279-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1988.tb00055.x.
5
In vitro fertilization and the right to reproduce.体外受精与生殖权利。
Bioethics. 1987 Jul;1(3):241-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1987.tb00010.x.
6
Strong Medicine, by Paul T. Menzel.《强效药物》，作者保罗·T·门泽尔。
Bioethics. 1992 Apr;6(2):130-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1992.tb00191.x.
7
Justice and the ADA: does prioritizing and rationing health care discriminate against the disabled?正义与《美国残疾人法案》：医疗保健的优先排序与配给是否对残疾人构成歧视？
Soc Philos Policy. 1995 Summer;12(2):159-85. doi: 10.1017/s0265052500004714.
8
Harm to the unconceived.
Philos Public Aff. 1976 Spring;5(3):292-304.
9
Abortion, property rights, and the welfare state.堕胎、财产权与福利国家。
Public Aff Q. 1998 Oct;12(4):369-81.
10
Savings and fertility: ethical issues.储蓄与生育：伦理问题。
Philos Public Aff. 1994 Spring;23(2):99-127. doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.1994.tb00007.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Our right to in vitro fertilisation--its scope and limits.我们的体外受精权利——其范围与限制
J Med Ethics. 2008 Nov;34(11):802-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.024232.
2
Should we change the human genome?我们应该改变人类基因组吗？
Theor Med. 1993 Sep;14(3):231-47. doi: 10.1007/BF00995165.