Suppr超能文献

我们的体外受精权利——其范围与限制

Our right to in vitro fertilisation--its scope and limits.

作者信息

Tännsjö T

机构信息

Stockholm University, Department of Philosophy, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2008 Nov;34(11):802-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.024232.

Abstract

There exists a derived negative right to procreative freedom, including a right to in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and to the exercise of selective techniques such as preimplantation genetic diagnosis. This is an extensive freedom, including not only the right to the exercise of a responsible parenthood, but also, in rare cases, to wrong decisions. It includes also a right for less than perfect parents to the use of IVF, and for IVF doctors to assist them, if they want and can agree about the terms.

摘要

存在一种派生的生育自由消极权利,包括体外受精(IVF)权利以及行使诸如植入前基因诊断等选择性技术的权利。这是一种广泛的自由,不仅包括行使负责任生育的权利,而且在罕见情况下还包括做出错误决定的权利。它还包括不完美父母使用体外受精的权利,以及如果体外受精医生愿意且能就相关条款达成一致,医生有协助他们的权利。

相似文献

1
Our right to in vitro fertilisation--its scope and limits.
J Med Ethics. 2008 Nov;34(11):802-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.024232.
4
Frozen embryos, genetic information and reproductive rights.
Bioethics. 2007 Oct;21(8):439-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00581.x.
6
The right to parenthood: an argument for a narrow interpretation.
Ethical Perspect. 2003;10(3-4):224-35. doi: 10.2143/ep.10.3.503888.
7
Reproductive rights.
Ethical Perspect. 2003;10(3-4):173-5.
8
Procreative reasons-relevance: on the moral significance of why we have children.
Bioethics. 2009 Jun;23(5):291-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00656.x. Epub 2008 Apr 25.
10
Reproductive autonomy, the non-identity problem, and the non-person problem.
Bioethics. 2009 Jan;23(1):59-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00681.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Who are the beneficiaries?
Bioethics. 1992 Oct;6(4):288-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1992.tb00207.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验