• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对拒绝医生协助自杀的观察:天主教视角

Observations on the rejection of physician-assisted suicide: a Roman Catholic perspective.

作者信息

Bresnahan James F

出版信息

Christ Bioeth. 1995 Dec;1(3):256-84. doi: 10.1093/cb/1.3.256.

DOI:10.1093/cb/1.3.256
PMID:11654496
Abstract

Roman Catholic moral theology follows a centuries-old tradition of moral reflection. Contemporary Roman Catholic moral theory applies these traditional arguments to the realm of medical ethics, including the issues of active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. Unavoidable moral limits on licit medical intervention sometimes require that the moral duty to treat cede to the duty to cease treatment when measures become more harmful than beneficial to the patient. This does not reduce the need for the compassionate use of palliative care in response to suffering. However, it does mean that rather than being excessively committed to maintaining mere biological human life, or actively seeking death, that we learn a sober realism about the limits of human life. Catholic moral analysis examines an act objectively, both in its relation to the agent and as a material event in the world. This allows both the virtuous or vicious intentions of the agent and the effects of the action to be included in its moral evaluation. Thus, Catholic moral analysis is both quasi-deontological and quasi-consequentialist. Objectively, active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, as acts of deliberate killing, are seen as repugnant, in that they fail to incarnate a benign inner intention or to form an agent in virtue. Catholic moral theology is extremely skeptical that an act of intending death directly can be consonant with a sincere compassion for the dying, suffering person and views it as a direct negation of the precious gift of human life.

摘要

罗马天主教道德神学遵循着有着数百年历史的道德反思传统。当代罗马天主教道德理论将这些传统论点应用于医学伦理领域,包括主动安乐死和医生协助自杀等问题。合法医疗干预中不可避免的道德限制有时要求,当治疗措施对患者的伤害大于益处时,治疗的道德义务要让位于停止治疗的义务。这并不减少出于同情使用姑息治疗以应对痛苦的必要性。然而,这确实意味着,我们不应过度执着于维持仅仅是生物意义上的人类生命,也不应积极寻求死亡,而是要对人类生命的限度有清醒的现实认识。天主教道德分析客观地审视一个行为,既考虑其与行为主体的关系,也将其视为世界上的一个物质事件。这使得行为主体的善恶意图以及行为的后果都能纳入其道德评价之中。因此,天主教道德分析既是准义务论的,也是准结果论的。客观地说,主动安乐死和医生协助自杀作为蓄意杀人行为,被视为令人厌恶的,因为它们未能体现出善意的内在意图,也未能塑造出有德行的行为主体。天主教道德神学极其怀疑直接意图导致死亡的行为能够与对濒死的、受苦的人的真诚同情相一致,并将其视为对人类生命这一珍贵礼物的直接否定。

相似文献

1
Observations on the rejection of physician-assisted suicide: a Roman Catholic perspective.对拒绝医生协助自杀的观察:天主教视角
Christ Bioeth. 1995 Dec;1(3):256-84. doi: 10.1093/cb/1.3.256.
2
Decisions at the end of life: Catholic tradition.临终决策:天主教传统
Christ Bioeth. 1997 Dec;3(3):188-203. doi: 10.1093/cb/3.3.188.
3
Death with dignity: a Roman Catholic perspective.尊严死:罗马天主教的观点。
Linacre Q. 1996 Nov;63(4):64-75. doi: 10.1080/20508549.1999.11878367.
4
End-of-life decisions: Christian perspectives.临终决策:基督教视角
Christ Bioeth. 1997 Dec;3(3):249-61. doi: 10.1093/cb/3.3.249.
5
Ethical issues and legalizing physician-assisted suicide.伦理问题与医生协助自杀合法化
Issues (St Louis Mo). 1996 Sep-Oct;11(5):1-8.
6
Psychospiritual care of the dying patient: the impact of being a Christian.临终患者的心理精神关怀:身为基督徒的影响。
Linacre Q. 1996 Aug;63(3):81-94.
7
Physician-assisted death: doctrinal develoment vs. Christian tradition.医生协助自杀:教义发展与基督教传统
Christ Bioeth. 1998 Aug;4(2):115-21. doi: 10.1076/chbi.4.2.115.6909.
8
Raising the stakes in the euthanasia debate: judge rules on Washington law.提高安乐死辩论的赌注:法官对华盛顿州法律作出裁决。
Origins. 1994 May 26;24(2):17, 19-20.
9
The Vatican Declaration on Euthanasia and some reflections on Christian ethical methodology.梵蒂冈关于安乐死的宣言及对基督教伦理方法的一些思考。
Thought. 1982 Dec;57(227):413-21. doi: 10.5840/thought198257437.
10
Moral perspectives on euthanasia.关于安乐死的道德观点。
Stud Christ Ethics. 1991;4(1):22-39. doi: 10.1177/095394689100400102.