Stempsey William E
Christ Bioeth. 1997 Dec;3(3):249-61. doi: 10.1093/cb/3.3.249.
While legal rights to make medical treatment decisions at the end of one's life have been recognized by the courts, particular religious traditions put axiological and metaphysical meat on the bare bones of legal rights. Mere legal rights do not capture the full reality, meaning and importance of death. End-of-life decisions reflect not only the meaning we find in dying, but also the meaning we have found in living. The Christian religions bring particular understandings of the vision of life as a gift from God, human responsibility for stewardship of that life, the wholeness of the person, and the importance of the dying process in preparing spiritually for life beyond earthly life, to bear on end-of-life decisions.
虽然法院已经认可了在生命末期做出医疗决策的合法权利,但特定的宗教传统为这些法律权利的空架子赋予了价值论和形而上学的实质内容。仅仅是法律权利并不能涵盖死亡的全部现实、意义和重要性。临终决策不仅反映了我们在死亡中所发现的意义,也反映了我们在生活中所发现的意义。基督教对生命的愿景有着独特的理解,即生命是上帝的恩赐,人类有责任管理这份生命,人的整体性,以及临终过程对于为尘世之外的生命进行精神准备的重要性,这些理解都会影响临终决策。