Hammar Lawrence
J Med Humanit. 1997 Spring;18(1):29-57. doi: 10.1023/a:1025658609595.
Medical experimentation on humans with "classic" sexually transmitted diseases (e.g., syphilis, gonorrhea) is not generally well known, but experimentation with others such as Granuloma inguinale, or Donovanosis, is even less so. Endemic to non-existent here, hyper-epidemic there, between 1880 and 1950 Donovanosis was linguistically and morally "constructed" as a disease of poor, sexually profligate, tropical, darkly-skinned persons. It was also experimentally produced on and in African-American patients in many charity hospitals in the American South. This essay analyzes Donovanosis literature of the period that heavily featured skin color, climate and tropicality, venereal sin, and racial susceptibility. It then recounts the history of human experimentation with it, and explains both its linguistic construction and its biomedical experimental history in terms of "disease narratives" produced not only by but for venereologists.
对人类进行“经典”性传播疾病(如梅毒、淋病)的医学实验并不广为人知,但对诸如腹股沟肉芽肿(或性病性肉芽肿)等其他疾病的实验更是鲜为人知。这种疾病在这里不存在,在那里呈高度流行,在1880年至1950年间,性病性肉芽肿在语言和道德层面上被“建构”为一种穷人群体、性放荡、热带地区、肤色黝黑人群所患的疾病。它还在美国南部许多慈善医院的非裔美国患者身上进行了实验。本文分析了这一时期大量涉及肤色、气候与热带地区、性病罪孽以及种族易感性的性病性肉芽肿文献。接着讲述了对人类进行该病实验的历史,并从不仅由性病学家产生、而且是为他们产生的“疾病叙事”角度,解释了该病的语言建构及其生物医学实验历史。